Nissan Cube MOT pass rate & common failures

The Nissan Cube appears in 16,526 MOT tests spanning model years 2000–2023, and 78.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (22.4% fail rate), the Cube comes out 1.2pp better. Its most common failure areas are lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

79%
Pass rate
16,526
MOT tests analysed
21.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs all cars of similar age
2000–2023
Model years covered

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 14.0% of all tests — 4.8 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, ball joint and rear fog lamp — position lamp alone was recorded 971 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 9.0% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 29.5% once past 150k — 3.3× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 24.5% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Nissan Cube 21.2% all cars avg 22.4%
Fail rate for the Nissan Cube against all cars of a similar age.

By model year

Every Cube model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Nissan Cube MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2002 104 70.2% 29.8% Lighting & signalling
2003 388 77.1% 22.9% Lighting & signalling
2004 566 77.0% 23.0% Lighting & signalling
2005 524 81.9% 18.1% Lighting & signalling
2006 559 80.0% 20.0% Lighting & signalling
2007 1,082 79.4% 20.6% Lighting & signalling
2008 1,236 81.5% 18.5% Lighting & signalling
2009 951 81.5% 18.5% Lighting & signalling
2010 6,014 75.8% 24.2% Suspension
2011 887 80.5% 19.5% Lighting & signalling
2012 438 89.7% 10.3% Lighting & signalling
2013 309 85.8% 14.2% Lighting & signalling
2014 301 76.7% 23.3% Lighting & signalling
2015 447 75.2% 24.8% Lighting & signalling
2016 556 76.4% 23.6% Lighting & signalling
2017 452 78.8% 21.2% Lighting & signalling
2018 424 82.8% 17.2% Lighting & signalling
2019 569 82.1% 17.9% Lighting & signalling
2020 421 83.1% 16.9% Lighting & signalling
2021 274 82.5% 17.5% Lighting & signalling

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.0% 2,306
2 Suspension 9.2% 1,520
3 Brakes 6.2% 1,024
4 Visibility 4.5% 737
5 Tyres 3.5% 587
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.1% 514
7 Emissions & environmental 2.8% 469
8 Seat belts & restraints 1.2% 193
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.0% Suspension 9.2% Brakes 6.2% Visibility 4.5% Tyres 3.5% Body, structure & corrosion 3.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Nissan Cube
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp971
2Ball joint763
3Rear fog lamp756
4Headlamp aim624
5Pins and bushes601
6Wipers435
7Washers390
8Headlamp382

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 24.5% 4,045
2 Brakes 22.0% 3,643
3 Tyres 21.7% 3,590
4 Lighting & signalling 9.5% 1,565
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.5% 1,412
6 Other defects 8.0% 1,318

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.0% 30-60k 14.4% 60-90k 20.0% 90-120k 24.5% 120-150k 26.6% 150k+ 29.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Nissan Cube
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 446 9.0%
30-60k 3,481 14.4%
60-90k 5,319 20.0%
90-120k 3,864 24.5%
120-150k 2,028 26.6%
150k+ 1,385 29.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 0 yrs 14.5% 1 yr 11.8% 2 yrs 14.8% 3 yrs 18.3% 4 yrs 18.7% 5 yrs 19.5% 6 yrs 23.9% 7 yrs 21.2% 8 yrs 25.8% 9 yrs 23.2% 10 yrs 20.5% 11 yrs 20.6% 12 yrs 20.6% 13 yrs 21.9% 14 yrs 23.7% 15 yrs 21.4% 16 yrs 18.9% 17 yrs 19.0% 18 yrs 21.2% 19 yrs 21.5% 20 yrs 19.8% 21 yrs 25.9% 22 yrs 26.3% 23 yrs 32.4%
How the Cube's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Nissan Cube
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 3,012 21.1%
2022 3,212 20.4%
2023 3,436 20.6%
2024 3,496 22.4%
2025 3,370 21.4%

What to check before buying a Nissan Cube

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Nissan Cube?

78.8% of the 16,526 Nissan Cube MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 21.2% fail rate, across model years 2000–2023.

What does the Nissan Cube most often fail its MOT on?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.0% of tests, then suspension (9.2%).

How much does mileage affect Cube MOT results?

Fail rates run at 9.0% for cars in the 0-30k band and 29.5% for 150k+, a 20.5-point difference.

Methodology & source. Based on 16,526 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data