2006 Nissan Cube — MOT failures & pass rate

559 MOT tests on the 2006 Nissan Cube are in this dataset, and 80.0% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 27.5% of the time, so this is 7.5pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

80%
Pass rate
559
MOT tests analysed
20.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
17.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 16.3% of all tests — 7.2 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, rear fog lamp and position lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 38 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 26.7% versus 11.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 21.6% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 12.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 22.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Cube 20.0% cars avg 23.8% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 16.3% 91
2 Suspension 9.1% 51
3 Brakes 6.3% 35
4 Tyres 3.6% 20
5 Visibility 2.3% 13
6 Emissions & environmental 2.0% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 16.3% Suspension 9.1% Brakes 6.3% Tyres 3.6% Visibility 2.3% Emissions & environmental 2.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Nissan Cube
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim38
2Rear fog lamp35
3Position lamp24
4Ball joint dust cover24
5Component mounting prescribed areas22
6Pins and bushes16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 21.6% 121
2 Tyres 20.9% 117
3 Brakes 17.7% 99
4 Body, structure & corrosion 9.5% 53
5 Lighting & signalling 7.3% 41
6 Visibility 6.8% 38

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 11.2% 60-90k 18.2% 90-120k 25.7% 120-150k 28.9% 150k+ 26.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Cube
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 143 11.2%
60-90k 181 18.2%
90-120k 109 25.7%
120-150k 76 28.9%
150k+ 45 26.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 12.0% 16 yrs 17.5% 17 yrs 20.5% 18 yrs 23.7% 19 yrs 22.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Cube
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 75 12.0%
2022 97 17.5%
2023 112 20.5%
2024 135 23.7%
2025 140 22.1%

What to check before buying a 2006 Cube

On a 2006 Cube, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 16.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Nissan Cubes pass their MOT?

80.0% of the 559 2006 Nissan Cube MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 20.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Nissan Cube?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.3% of tests, followed by suspension (9.1%).

Does the 2006 Cube get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.2% in the 30-60k band to 26.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 559 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data