2009 Nissan Cube — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2009 Nissan Cube passed 81.5% of its 951 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 25.6% of the time, so this is 7.1pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

81%
Pass rate
951
MOT tests analysed
18.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
14.1
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.8% of tests against 5.8% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, position lamp and headlamp aim — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 66 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 10.9% in the 0-30k band and 27.9% in the 150k+ band, a 17.0-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 20.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 20.1% in 2021 to 17.8% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Cube 18.5% cars avg 21.9% National avg 25.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.8% 131
2 Suspension 5.8% 55
3 Brakes 4.3% 41
4 Visibility 4.1% 39
5 Tyres 3.0% 29
6 Emissions & environmental 2.9% 28
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.8% Suspension 5.8% Brakes 4.3% Visibility 4.1% Tyres 3.0% Emissions & environmental 2.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Nissan Cube
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp66
2Position lamp43
3Headlamp aim31
4Catalyst emissions27
5Pins and bushes26
6Ball joint25

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 20.3% 193
2 Suspension 17.8% 169
3 Brakes 17.6% 167
4 Other defects 11.5% 109
5 Lighting & signalling 8.4% 80
6 Body, structure & corrosion 7.3% 69

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.9% 30-60k 10.8% 60-90k 17.0% 90-120k 22.7% 120-150k 26.0% 150k+ 27.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Cube
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 46 10.9%
30-60k 223 10.8%
60-90k 306 17.0%
90-120k 150 22.7%
120-150k 104 26.0%
150k+ 122 27.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 20.1% 13 yrs 16.5% 14 yrs 20.0% 15 yrs 18.1% 16 yrs 17.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Cube
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 154 20.1%
2022 176 16.5%
2023 215 20.0%
2024 204 18.1%
2025 202 17.8%

What to check before buying a 2009 Cube

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 13.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Nissan Cubes pass their MOT?

81.5% of the 951 2009 Nissan Cube MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Nissan Cube?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.8% of tests, followed by suspension (5.8%).

Does the 2009 Cube get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.9% in the 0-30k band to 27.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 951 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data