2008 Nissan Cube — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,236 MOT tests, the 2008 Nissan Cube recorded an 81.5% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 26.4% of the time, so this is 7.9pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

81%
Pass rate
1,236
MOT tests analysed
18.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
15.1
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 13.5% of all tests — 6.1 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, position lamp and headlamp aim — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 75 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 6.1% in the 0-30k band and 34.8% in the 150k+ band, a 28.8-point spread — more than double.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 21.8% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 20.0% in 2021 to 18.0% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Cube 18.5% cars avg 22.6% National avg 26.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.5% 167
2 Suspension 7.4% 92
3 Brakes 5.9% 73
4 Body, structure & corrosion 3.6% 45
5 Visibility 3.6% 44
6 Tyres 3.2% 39
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.5% Suspension 7.4% Brakes 5.9% Body, structure & corrosion 3.6% Visibility 3.6% Tyres 3.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Nissan Cube
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp75
2Position lamp51
3Headlamp aim45
4Service brake performance36
5Headlamp36
6Ball joint36

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 21.8% 269
2 Tyres 19.3% 239
3 Brakes 15.2% 188
4 Body, structure & corrosion 11.5% 142
5 Lighting & signalling 7.0% 86
6 Other defects 6.2% 77

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.1% 30-60k 10.5% 60-90k 15.8% 90-120k 18.8% 120-150k 25.9% 150k+ 34.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Cube
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 33 6.1%
30-60k 276 10.5%
60-90k 404 15.8%
90-120k 218 18.8%
120-150k 147 25.9%
150k+ 158 34.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 20.0% 14 yrs 21.1% 15 yrs 14.7% 16 yrs 19.1% 17 yrs 18.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Cube
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 200 20.0%
2022 247 21.1%
2023 251 14.7%
2024 282 19.1%
2025 256 18.0%

What to check before buying a 2008 Cube

On a 2008 Cube, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 13.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Nissan Cubes pass their MOT?

81.5% of the 1,236 2008 Nissan Cube MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Nissan Cube?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.5% of tests, followed by suspension (7.4%).

Does the 2008 Cube get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.1% in the 0-30k band to 34.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,236 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data