2010 Nissan Cube — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2010 Nissan Cube passed 75.8% of its 6,014 recorded MOT tests. That is effectively the same as all cars of a similar age (24.4% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

76%
Pass rate
6,014
MOT tests analysed
24.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
13
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (13.2%) and lighting & signalling (12.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, ball joint and pins and bushes — position lamp alone was recorded 501 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 9.8% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 30.9% once past 150k — 3.2× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 28.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 23.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 24.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Cube 24.2% cars avg 20.8% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 13.2% 795
2 Lighting & signalling 12.7% 761
3 Brakes 7.3% 439
4 Visibility 5.2% 311
5 Tyres 4.1% 248
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.6% 216
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 13.2% Lighting & signalling 12.7% Brakes 7.3% Visibility 5.2% Tyres 4.1% Body, structure & corrosion 3.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Nissan Cube
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp501
2Ball joint500
3Pins and bushes379
4Headlamp aim196
5Brake pads185
6Wipers178

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.0% 1,682
2 Suspension 27.5% 1,652
3 Tyres 24.5% 1,475
4 Lighting & signalling 9.9% 595
5 Other defects 9.3% 559
6 Body, structure & corrosion 7.9% 473

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.8% 30-60k 19.1% 60-90k 23.9% 90-120k 27.7% 120-150k 29.0% 150k+ 30.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Cube
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 143 9.8%
30-60k 1,326 19.1%
60-90k 2,272 23.9%
90-120k 1,503 27.7%
120-150k 565 29.0%
150k+ 204 30.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 23.0% 12 yrs 23.1% 13 yrs 24.3% 14 yrs 25.8% 15 yrs 24.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Cube
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,183 23.0%
2022 1,203 23.1%
2023 1,228 24.3%
2024 1,227 25.8%
2025 1,173 24.6%

What to check before buying a 2010 Cube

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 13.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Nissan Cubes pass their MOT?

75.8% of the 6,014 2010 Nissan Cube MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 24.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Nissan Cube?

Suspension, recorded in 13.2% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (12.7%).

Does the 2010 Cube get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.8% in the 0-30k band to 30.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,014 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data