2015 Nissan Cube — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2015 Nissan Cube passed 75.2% of its 447 recorded MOT tests. That is 9.2 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 15.7%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

75%
Pass rate
447
MOT tests analysed
24.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
7.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 18.1% of all tests — 9.2 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, position lamp and headlamp aim — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 41 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 14.6% of 60-90k cars fail, rising to 28.6% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 27.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 22.4% of tests failed in 2021 against 24.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2015 Cube 24.8% cars avg 13.9% National avg 15.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2015 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.1% 81
2 Suspension 8.9% 40
3 Brakes 8.5% 38
4 Visibility 4.7% 21
5 Emissions & environmental 4.5% 20
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.1% 14
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.1% Suspension 8.9% Brakes 8.5% Visibility 4.7% Emissions & environmental 4.5% Body, structure & corrosion 3.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2015 Nissan Cube
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp41
2Position lamp38
3Headlamp aim24
4Catalyst emissions23
5Service brake performance20
6Headlamp14

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2015 Nissan Cube
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 27.3% 122
2 Tyres 26.2% 117
3 Brakes 25.3% 113
4 Lighting & signalling 14.5% 65
5 Body, structure & corrosion 9.8% 44
6 Other defects 6.7% 30

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 14.6% 90-120k 33.1% 120-150k 23.2% 150k+ 28.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2015 Cube
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 82 14.6%
90-120k 130 33.1%
120-150k 108 23.2%
150k+ 98 28.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 6 yrs 22.4% 7 yrs 24.1% 8 yrs 29.2% 9 yrs 22.8% 10 yrs 24.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2015 Cube
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 116 22.4%
2022 108 24.1%
2023 113 29.2%
2024 57 22.8%
2025 53 24.5%

What to check before buying a 2015 Cube

On a 2015 Cube, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2015 Nissan Cubes pass their MOT?

75.2% of the 447 2015 Nissan Cube MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 24.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2015 Nissan Cube?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.1% of tests, followed by suspension (8.9%).

Does the 2015 Cube get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.6% in the 60-90k band to 28.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 447 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data