Volvo C70 MOT pass rate & common failures

The Volvo C70 appears in 56,307 MOT tests spanning model years 1997–2021, and 73.6% of them passed. That is 5.6 percentage points worse than coupes & convertibles of a similar age, which fail at 20.8%. Its most common failure areas are suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

74%
Pass rate
56,307
MOT tests analysed
26.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
1997–2021
Model years covered

Best and worst C70 years

Strongest year
2013

79.7% pass rate from 1,485 tests.

See the 2013 report
Weakest year
2006

71.2% pass rate from 7,791 tests.

See the 2006 report

Ranked across C70 years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

The strongest year on this record is 2013 (79.7% pass rate); the weakest is 2006 (71.2%). Older cars carry more of the difference than the average implies.

No single area dominates — suspension (12.1%) and lighting & signalling (11.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, joints and headlamp aim — coil spring alone was recorded 3,496 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 30.1% versus 14.6%.

Fuel type barely separates them — petrol fails 26.2% of the time against 26.7% for diesel.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 29.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Volvo C70 26.4% coupes & convertibles avg 20.8%
Fail rate for the Volvo C70 against coupes & convertibles of a similar age.

By model year

Every C70 model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Volvo C70 MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
1998 355 78.9% 21.1% Lighting & signalling
1999 659 78.9% 21.1% Lighting & signalling
2000 981 77.5% 22.5% Lighting & signalling
2001 1,501 76.6% 23.4% Lighting & signalling
2002 1,924 75.8% 24.2% Lighting & signalling
2003 3,126 76.0% 24.0% Lighting & signalling
2004 3,663 74.3% 25.7% Suspension
2005 2,905 74.8% 25.2% Lighting & signalling
2006 7,791 71.2% 28.8% Suspension
2007 8,408 72.1% 27.9% Suspension
2008 7,669 71.8% 28.2% Suspension
2009 5,943 72.0% 28.0% Suspension
2010 4,901 73.2% 26.8% Suspension
2011 3,196 75.5% 24.5% Suspension
2012 1,761 79.0% 20.9% Suspension
2013 1,485 79.7% 20.3% Suspension

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Volvo C70
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 12.1% 6,821
2 Lighting & signalling 11.2% 6,323
3 Brakes 8.1% 4,563
4 Tyres 7.6% 4,299
5 Body, structure & corrosion 5.8% 3,256
6 Visibility 3.5% 1,944
7 Steering 3.0% 1,704
8 Emissions & environmental 2.8% 1,570
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 12.1% Lighting & signalling 11.2% Brakes 8.1% Tyres 7.6% Body, structure & corrosion 5.8% Visibility 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Volvo C70
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring3,496
2Joints2,863
3Headlamp aim2,665
4Position lamp2,061
5Rbt (sp)1,827
6Pins and bushes1,702
7Shock absorbers1,597
8Headlamp1,486

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Volvo C70
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 29.0% 16,347
2 Suspension 28.7% 16,156
3 Brakes 23.0% 12,971
4 Lighting & signalling 12.1% 6,804
5 Other defects 10.9% 6,146
6 Body, structure & corrosion 9.5% 5,349

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 14.6% 30-60k 20.3% 60-90k 25.6% 90-120k 28.4% 120-150k 29.6% 150k+ 30.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Volvo C70
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 1,302 14.6%
30-60k 7,821 20.3%
60-90k 17,353 25.6%
90-120k 16,707 28.4%
120-150k 9,067 29.6%
150k+ 4,041 30.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 8 yrs 17.0% 9 yrs 18.2% 10 yrs 21.4% 11 yrs 24.5% 12 yrs 25.5% 13 yrs 27.5% 14 yrs 27.9% 15 yrs 28.0% 16 yrs 27.6% 17 yrs 27.6% 18 yrs 27.3% 19 yrs 26.7% 20 yrs 24.6% 21 yrs 23.4% 22 yrs 22.9% 23 yrs 22.9% 24 yrs 21.8% 25 yrs 21.1%
How the C70's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Volvo C70
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 30,134 26.2%
Diesel 26,166 26.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Volvo C70
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 13,445 26.3%
2022 12,390 25.8%
2023 11,471 26.8%
2024 10,128 27.0%
2025 8,873 26.3%

What to check before buying a Volvo C70

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Volvo C70?

73.6% of the 56,307 Volvo C70 MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 26.4% fail rate, across model years 1997–2021.

What does the Volvo C70 most often fail its MOT on?

Suspension, recorded in 12.1% of tests, then lighting & signalling (11.2%).

Which C70 years are best and worst for MOT results?

2013 has the best pass rate at 79.7% and 2006 the weakest at 71.2%, from 1,485 and 7,791 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect C70 MOT results?

Fail rates run at 14.6% for cars in the 0-30k band and 30.1% for 150k+, a 15.6-point difference.

Is the petrol or diesel C70 more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the petrol fails 26.2% of the time against 26.7% for the diesel. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 56,307 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data