2005 Volvo C70 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2005 Volvo C70 passed 74.8% of its 2,905 recorded MOT tests. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 22.2% of the time, so this is 3.0pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

75%
Pass rate
2,905
MOT tests analysed
25.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
17.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (11.6%) and suspension (10.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, coil spring and headlamp aim — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 146 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 14.1% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 28.3% once past 150k — 2.0× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 28.6% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 C70 25.2% coupes & convertibles avg 22.2% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Volvo C70
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 11.6% 337
2 Suspension 10.4% 301
3 Brakes 8.5% 246
4 Tyres 7.4% 215
5 Steering 4.3% 124
6 Visibility 4.2% 121
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 11.6% Suspension 10.4% Brakes 8.5% Tyres 7.4% Steering 4.3% Visibility 4.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Volvo C70
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover146
2Coil spring134
3Headlamp aim132
4Wipers130
5Position lamp107
6Rbt (sp)98

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Volvo C70
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 28.6% 832
2 Brakes 27.3% 794
3 Suspension 26.3% 764
4 Other defects 20.3% 590
5 Lighting & signalling 14.4% 418
6 Body, structure & corrosion 8.9% 259

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 14.1% 30-60k 22.8% 60-90k 24.1% 90-120k 26.8% 120-150k 29.3% 150k+ 28.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 C70
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 99 14.1%
30-60k 417 22.8%
60-90k 988 24.1%
90-120k 973 26.8%
120-150k 321 29.3%
150k+ 106 28.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 24.4% 17 yrs 25.6% 18 yrs 23.4% 19 yrs 27.7% 20 yrs 25.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 C70
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 713 24.4%
2022 661 25.6%
2023 581 23.4%
2024 517 27.7%
2025 433 25.4%

What to check before buying a 2005 C70

On a 2005 C70, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 11.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Volvo C70s pass their MOT?

74.8% of the 2,905 2005 Volvo C70 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 25.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Volvo C70?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 11.6% of tests, followed by suspension (10.4%).

Does the 2005 C70 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.1% in the 0-30k band to 28.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,905 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data