2011 Toyota Previa — MOT failures & pass rate

265 MOT tests on the 2011 Toyota Previa are in this dataset, and 72.8% of them passed. That is 3.4 percentage points worse than MPVs of a similar age, which fail at 23.8%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

73%
Pass rate
265
MOT tests analysed
27.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
11.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 22.3% of all tests — 11.3 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and position lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 32 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 31.9% versus 18.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 34.7% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 30.7% in 2021 to 22.9% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2011 Previa 27.2% MPVs avg 23.8% National avg 22.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2011 Toyota Previa
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 22.3% 59
2 Suspension 10.9% 29
3 Brakes 10.2% 27
4 Emissions & environmental 9.8% 26
5 Body, structure & corrosion 6.0% 16
6 Visibility 4.9% 13
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 22.3% Suspension 10.9% Brakes 10.2% Emissions & environmental 9.8% Body, structure & corrosion 6.0% Visibility 4.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2011 Toyota Previa
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim32
2Catalyst emissions24
3Position lamp20
4Headlamp19
5Rear fog lamp19
6Wipers14

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2011 Toyota Previa
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 34.7% 92
2 Brakes 32.5% 86
3 Emissions & environmental 30.6% 81
4 Tyres 21.1% 56
5 Lighting & signalling 20.0% 53
6 Other defects 12.4% 33

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 18.2% 120-150k 29.0% 150k+ 31.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2011 Previa
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 33 18.2%
120-150k 62 29.0%
150k+ 119 31.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 10 yrs 30.7% 11 yrs 26.5% 12 yrs 25.0% 13 yrs 28.2% 14 yrs 22.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2011 Previa
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 75 30.7%
2022 68 26.5%
2023 48 25.0%
2024 39 28.2%
2025 35 22.9%

What to check before buying a 2011 Previa

On a 2011 Previa, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 22.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2011 Toyota Previas pass their MOT?

72.8% of the 265 2011 Toyota Previa MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2011 Toyota Previa?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 22.3% of tests, followed by suspension (10.9%).

Does the 2011 Previa get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 18.2% in the 30-60k band to 31.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 265 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data