Hyundai Matrix MOT pass rate & common failures

The Hyundai Matrix appears in 28,333 MOT tests spanning model years 2001–2017, and 70.3% of them passed. That is effectively the same as MPVs of a similar age (29.2% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Its most common failure areas are lighting & signalling, suspension and body, structure & corrosion.

70%
Pass rate
28,333
MOT tests analysed
29.7%
Fail rate
in line with
vs MPVs of similar age
2001–2017
Model years covered

Best and worst Matrix years

Strongest year
2010

74.3% pass rate from 1,129 tests.

See the 2010 report
Weakest year
2004

68.8% pass rate from 3,332 tests.

See the 2004 report

Ranked across Matrix years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

Build year matters more than the headline suggests: 2010 cars pass 74.3% of the time while 2004 cars manage 68.8%, a 5.5-point spread.

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (12.4%) and suspension (12.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are joints, rigid brake pipes and headlamp aim — joints alone was recorded 2,766 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 38.8% versus 16.0%.

Split by fuel, diesel examples fail 3.2pp more often than petrol ones (32.7% vs 29.5%) — worth weighing if you have a choice.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 34.2% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Hyundai Matrix 29.7% MPVs avg 29.2%
Fail rate for the Hyundai Matrix against MPVs of a similar age.

By model year

Every Matrix model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Hyundai Matrix MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2001 94 70.2% 29.8% Body, structure & corrosion
2002 753 67.6% 32.4% Body, structure & corrosion
2003 1,630 69.3% 30.7% Suspension
2004 3,332 68.8% 31.1% Suspension
2005 5,216 69.7% 30.3% Lighting & signalling
2006 5,662 70.6% 29.4% Suspension
2007 4,989 68.9% 31.1% Lighting & signalling
2008 3,361 71.6% 28.4% Lighting & signalling
2009 2,120 74.0% 26.0% Lighting & signalling
2010 1,129 74.3% 25.7% Suspension

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Hyundai Matrix
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 12.4% 3,506
2 Suspension 12.1% 3,436
3 Body, structure & corrosion 10.9% 3,089
4 Brakes 10.3% 2,912
5 Tyres 6.8% 1,937
6 Visibility 6.8% 1,918
7 Seat belts & restraints 4.8% 1,361
8 Steering 3.6% 1,024
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 12.4% Suspension 12.1% Body, structure & corrosion 10.9% Brakes 10.3% Tyres 6.8% Visibility 6.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Hyundai Matrix
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Joints2,766
2Rigid brake pipes1,918
3Headlamp aim1,918
4Headlamp1,432
5Wipers1,317
6Ball joint1,270
7Tread depth1,113
8Sub-frame1,040

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Hyundai Matrix
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 34.2% 9,684
2 Tyres 30.9% 8,767
3 Suspension 28.8% 8,166
4 Body, structure & corrosion 20.7% 5,858
5 Lighting & signalling 17.1% 4,849
6 Other defects 14.5% 4,098

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 16.0% 30-60k 22.8% 60-90k 30.6% 90-120k 34.4% 120-150k 37.2% 150k+ 38.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Hyundai Matrix
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 969 16.0%
30-60k 6,932 22.8%
60-90k 11,038 30.6%
90-120k 6,935 34.4%
120-150k 1,970 37.2%
150k+ 477 38.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 21.9% 12 yrs 24.4% 13 yrs 26.5% 14 yrs 28.6% 15 yrs 28.6% 16 yrs 29.6% 17 yrs 31.3% 18 yrs 30.9% 19 yrs 30.9% 20 yrs 30.9% 21 yrs 31.0% 22 yrs 28.6% 23 yrs 29.7%
How the Matrix's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Hyundai Matrix
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 26,197 29.5%
Diesel 2,132 32.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Hyundai Matrix
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 7,894 29.4%
2022 6,581 29.4%
2023 5,512 29.1%
2024 4,636 30.5%
2025 3,710 30.9%

What to check before buying a Hyundai Matrix

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Hyundai Matrix?

70.3% of the 28,333 Hyundai Matrix MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 29.7% fail rate, across model years 2001–2017.

What does the Hyundai Matrix most often fail its MOT on?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.4% of tests, then suspension (12.1%).

Which Matrix years are best and worst for MOT results?

2010 has the best pass rate at 74.3% and 2004 the weakest at 68.8%, from 1,129 and 3,332 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect Matrix MOT results?

Fail rates run at 16.0% for cars in the 0-30k band and 38.8% for 150k+, a 22.8-point difference.

Is the petrol or diesel Matrix more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the petrol fails 29.5% of the time against 32.7% for the diesel. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 28,333 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data