2010 Toyota Previa — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 288 MOT tests, the 2010 Toyota Previa recorded a 70.8% pass rate. MPVs of a similar age fail 25.2% of the time, so this is 4.0pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and emissions & environmental.

71%
Pass rate
288
MOT tests analysed
29.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
12.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.9% of tests against 10.8% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp, headlamp aim and catalyst emissions — headlamp alone was recorded 32 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 24.2% of 60-90k cars fail, rising to 32.0% once past 150k.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 46.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 29.9% in 2021 to 22.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Previa 29.2% MPVs avg 25.2% National avg 23.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Toyota Previa
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 21.9% 63
2 Brakes 10.8% 31
3 Emissions & environmental 10.1% 29
4 Suspension 10.1% 29
5 Visibility 6.6% 19
6 Body, structure & corrosion 6.3% 18
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 21.9% Brakes 10.8% Emissions & environmental 10.1% Suspension 10.1% Visibility 6.6% Body, structure & corrosion 6.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Toyota Previa
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp32
2Headlamp aim25
3Catalyst emissions23
4Rear fog lamp20
5Wipers17
6Stop lamp16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Toyota Previa
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 46.2% 133
2 Brakes 31.6% 91
3 Tyres 29.2% 84
4 Emissions & environmental 27.8% 80
5 Lighting & signalling 26.4% 76
6 Body, structure & corrosion 10.8% 31

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 24.2% 90-120k 25.0% 120-150k 30.5% 150k+ 32.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Previa
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 33 24.2%
90-120k 36 25.0%
120-150k 59 30.5%
150k+ 150 32.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 29.9% 12 yrs 27.7% 13 yrs 29.8% 14 yrs 34.2% 15 yrs 22.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Previa
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 97 29.9%
2022 65 27.7%
2023 57 29.8%
2024 38 34.2%
2025 31 22.6%

What to check before buying a 2010 Previa

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 21.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Toyota Previas pass their MOT?

70.8% of the 288 2010 Toyota Previa MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Toyota Previa?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.9% of tests, followed by brakes (10.8%).

Does the 2010 Previa get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 24.2% in the 60-90k band to 32.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 288 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data