2007 Toyota Mr2 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 314 MOT tests, the 2007 Toyota Mr2 recorded a 76.1% pass rate. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 21.5% of the time, so this is 2.4pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

76%
Pass rate
314
MOT tests analysed
23.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
15.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.3% of tests against 12.1% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, service brake performance and rbt (sp) — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 33 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 26.8% versus 22.5%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 26.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 28.7% in 2021 to 24.4% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2007 Mr2 23.9% coupes & convertibles avg 21.5% National avg 26.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2007 Toyota Mr2
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.3% 48
2 Brakes 12.1% 38
3 Suspension 8.3% 26
4 Emissions & environmental 8.3% 26
5 Visibility 3.8% 12
6 Steering 3.2% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.3% Brakes 12.1% Suspension 8.3% Emissions & environmental 8.3% Visibility 3.8% Steering 3.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2007 Toyota Mr2
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions33
2Service brake performance23
3Rbt (sp)18
4Position lamp16
5Headlamp aim16
6Rear fog lamp15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2007 Toyota Mr2
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 26.8% 84
2 Brakes 21.3% 67
3 Tyres 15.3% 48
4 Lighting & signalling 13.7% 43
5 Emissions & environmental 12.4% 39
6 Body, structure & corrosion 8.9% 28

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 22.5% 90-120k 23.5% 120-150k 26.1% 150k+ 26.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2007 Mr2
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 80 22.5%
90-120k 102 23.5%
120-150k 69 26.1%
150k+ 41 26.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 14 yrs 28.7% 15 yrs 20.0% 16 yrs 21.2% 17 yrs 23.6% 18 yrs 24.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2007 Mr2
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 87 28.7%
2022 65 20.0%
2023 66 21.2%
2024 55 23.6%
2025 41 24.4%

What to check before buying a 2007 Mr2

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2007 Toyota Mr2s pass their MOT?

76.1% of the 314 2007 Toyota Mr2 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2007 Toyota Mr2?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.3% of tests, followed by brakes (12.1%).

Does the 2007 Mr2 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 22.5% in the 60-90k band to 26.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 314 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data