2006 Toyota Mr2 — MOT failures & pass rate

4,677 MOT tests on the 2006 Toyota Mr2 are in this dataset, and 79.0% of them passed. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail at 21.9%, so the 2006 Mr2 sits squarely on the average. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

79%
Pass rate
4,677
MOT tests analysed
21.0%
Fail rate
in line with
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
16.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Brakes dominates the failure mix at 14.1% of all tests — 6.3 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), headlamp aim and parking brake performance — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 464 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 7.4% in the 0-30k band and 23.5% in the 150k+ band, a 16.1-point spread — more than double.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 26.3% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Mr2 21.0% coupes & convertibles avg 21.9% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Toyota Mr2
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 14.1% 661
2 Lighting & signalling 7.8% 365
3 Suspension 5.2% 242
4 Emissions & environmental 4.9% 230
5 Visibility 3.0% 141
6 Tyres 2.9% 137
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 14.1% Lighting & signalling 7.8% Suspension 5.2% Emissions & environmental 4.9% Visibility 3.0% Tyres 2.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Toyota Mr2
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)464
2Headlamp aim192
3Parking brake performance192
4Catalyst emissions163
5Wipers141
6Service brake performance131

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Toyota Mr2
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 26.3% 1,230
2 Brakes 24.5% 1,146
3 Tyres 17.4% 816
4 Lighting & signalling 8.6% 403
5 Other defects 5.0% 235
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.8% 179

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 7.4% 30-60k 17.1% 60-90k 24.9% 90-120k 26.1% 120-150k 23.3% 150k+ 23.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Mr2
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 432 7.4%
30-60k 1,418 17.1%
60-90k 1,686 24.9%
90-120k 756 26.1%
120-150k 266 23.3%
150k+ 119 23.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 21.3% 16 yrs 21.2% 17 yrs 18.6% 18 yrs 21.9% 19 yrs 21.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Mr2
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,053 21.3%
2022 1,000 21.2%
2023 914 18.6%
2024 858 21.9%
2025 852 21.9%

What to check before buying a 2006 Mr2

On a 2006 Mr2, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Toyota Mr2s pass their MOT?

79.0% of the 4,677 2006 Toyota Mr2 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Toyota Mr2?

Brakes, recorded in 14.1% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (7.8%).

Does the 2006 Mr2 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.4% in the 0-30k band to 23.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,677 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data