2004 Smart City — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2004 Smart City passed 72.6% of its 1,099 recorded MOT tests. That is effectively the same as all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

73%
Pass rate
1,099
MOT tests analysed
27.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
18.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.6% of tests against 10.1% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and washers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 115 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 20.8% in the 0-30k band and 34.6% in the 90-120k band, a 13.9-point spread.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 33.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 30.2% in 2021 to 24.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 City 27.4% cars avg 24.2% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Smart City
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.6% 193
2 Suspension 10.1% 111
3 Visibility 9.5% 104
4 Emissions & environmental 9.1% 100
5 Brakes 7.7% 85
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.8% 64
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.6% Suspension 10.1% Visibility 9.5% Emissions & environmental 9.1% Brakes 7.7% Body, structure & corrosion 5.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Smart City
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim115
2Catalyst emissions104
3Washers83
4Stop lamp69
5Headlamp65
6Coil spring45

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Smart City
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.4% 367
2 Tyres 24.6% 270
3 Suspension 23.9% 263
4 Lighting & signalling 13.7% 151
5 Emissions & environmental 11.5% 126
6 Other defects 8.6% 94

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 20.8% 30-60k 24.4% 60-90k 26.9% 90-120k 34.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 City
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 53 20.8%
30-60k 361 24.4%
60-90k 469 26.9%
90-120k 179 34.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 30.2% 18 yrs 27.7% 19 yrs 26.1% 20 yrs 26.1% 21 yrs 24.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 City
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 308 30.2%
2022 249 27.7%
2023 211 26.1%
2024 176 26.1%
2025 155 24.5%

What to check before buying a 2004 City

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 17.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Smart Citys pass their MOT?

72.6% of the 1,099 2004 Smart City MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Smart City?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.6% of tests, followed by suspension (10.1%).

Does the 2004 City get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.8% in the 0-30k band to 34.6% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,099 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data