2005 Smart City — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 908 MOT tests, the 2005 Smart City recorded a 74.6% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 27.6% of the time, so this is 2.2pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and suspension.

75%
Pass rate
908
MOT tests analysed
25.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
17.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 17.0% of all tests — 7.2 points clear of visibility, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, washers and catalyst emissions — headlamp aim alone was recorded 104 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2005 City fails 27.3% of the time in the 0-30k band and 29.1% at 90-120k, a spread of only 1.9 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 34.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 22.4% of tests failed in 2021 against 27.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 City 25.4% cars avg 23.9% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Smart City
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.0% 154
2 Visibility 9.8% 89
3 Suspension 9.4% 85
4 Brakes 7.6% 69
5 Emissions & environmental 7.0% 64
6 Tyres 4.2% 38
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.0% Visibility 9.8% Suspension 9.4% Brakes 7.6% Emissions & environmental 7.0% Tyres 4.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Smart City
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim104
2Washers71
3Catalyst emissions67
4Stop lamp51
5Wipers43
6Headlamp39

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Smart City
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 34.3% 311
2 Suspension 28.6% 260
3 Tyres 24.6% 223
4 Lighting & signalling 13.7% 124
5 Emissions & environmental 12.6% 114
6 Body, structure & corrosion 11.0% 100

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 27.3% 30-60k 23.7% 60-90k 26.1% 90-120k 29.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 City
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 44 27.3%
30-60k 359 23.7%
60-90k 357 26.1%
90-120k 127 29.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 22.4% 17 yrs 25.4% 18 yrs 26.8% 19 yrs 26.8% 20 yrs 27.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 City
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 228 22.4%
2022 217 25.4%
2023 179 26.8%
2024 157 26.8%
2025 127 27.6%

What to check before buying a 2005 City

On a 2005 City, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 17.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Smart Citys pass their MOT?

74.6% of the 908 2005 Smart City MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 25.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Smart City?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.0% of tests, followed by visibility (9.8%).

Does the 2005 City get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 27.3% in the 0-30k band to 29.1% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 908 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data