2007 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 293 MOT tests, the 2007 Smart Cabriolet recorded a 77.5% pass rate. That is 4.4 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 26.9%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

77%
Pass rate
293
MOT tests analysed
22.5%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
15.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 16.0% of all tests — 6.8 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, coil spring and stop lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 26 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 20.7% in the 30-60k band and 28.1% in the 90-120k band, a 7.4-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 29.7% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 20.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 25.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2007 Cabriolet 22.5% cars avg 23.1% National avg 26.9%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2007 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 16.0% 47
2 Suspension 9.2% 27
3 Brakes 7.5% 22
4 Tyres 6.1% 18
5 Visibility 5.8% 17
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.1% 15
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 16.0% Suspension 9.2% Brakes 7.5% Tyres 6.1% Visibility 5.8% Body, structure & corrosion 5.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2007 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim26
2Coil spring18
3Stop lamp17
4Washers13
5Service brake performance13
6Headlamp12

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2007 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 29.7% 87
2 Tyres 23.2% 68
3 Suspension 18.8% 55
4 Lighting & signalling 8.5% 25
5 Other defects 5.8% 17
6 Emissions & environmental 5.8% 17

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 20.7% 60-90k 23.8% 90-120k 28.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2007 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 116 20.7%
60-90k 105 23.8%
90-120k 57 28.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 14 yrs 20.0% 15 yrs 19.0% 16 yrs 22.8% 17 yrs 25.4% 18 yrs 25.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2007 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 65 20.0%
2022 58 19.0%
2023 57 22.8%
2024 59 25.4%
2025 54 25.9%

What to check before buying a 2007 Cabriolet

On a 2007 Cabriolet, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 16.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2007 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

77.5% of the 293 2007 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 22.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2007 Smart Cabriolet?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.0% of tests, followed by suspension (9.2%).

Does the 2007 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.7% in the 30-60k band to 28.1% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 293 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data