2006 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

448 MOT tests on the 2006 Smart Cabriolet are in this dataset, and 73.0% of them passed. That is effectively the same as all cars of a similar age (27.3% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

73%
Pass rate
448
MOT tests analysed
27.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
16.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.6% of tests against 10.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, washers and catalyst emissions — headlamp aim alone was recorded 56 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 23.9% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 33.3% once past 90-120k.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 32.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 30.8% in 2021 to 21.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Cabriolet 27.0% cars avg 23.5% National avg 27.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.6% 79
2 Suspension 10.0% 45
3 Visibility 9.8% 44
4 Brakes 8.3% 37
5 Emissions & environmental 7.6% 34
6 Tyres 4.2% 19
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.6% Suspension 10.0% Visibility 9.8% Brakes 8.3% Emissions & environmental 7.6% Tyres 4.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim56
2Washers39
3Catalyst emissions34
4Stop lamp23
5Coil spring22
6Position lamp21

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 32.4% 145
2 Tyres 25.9% 116
3 Suspension 21.9% 98
4 Lighting & signalling 12.0% 54
5 Steering 9.2% 41
6 Emissions & environmental 7.6% 34

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 23.9% 60-90k 29.5% 90-120k 33.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 180 23.9%
60-90k 200 29.5%
90-120k 45 33.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 30.8% 16 yrs 28.0% 17 yrs 29.0% 18 yrs 22.4% 19 yrs 21.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 107 30.8%
2022 107 28.0%
2023 93 29.0%
2024 76 22.4%
2025 65 21.5%

What to check before buying a 2006 Cabriolet

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 17.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

73.0% of the 448 2006 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Smart Cabriolet?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.6% of tests, followed by suspension (10.0%).

Does the 2006 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 23.9% in the 30-60k band to 33.3% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 448 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data