2005 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

564 MOT tests on the 2005 Smart Cabriolet are in this dataset, and 74.7% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.6% fail rate), the 2005 Cabriolet comes out 2.2pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

75%
Pass rate
564
MOT tests analysed
25.4%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
17.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 18.4% of all tests — 7.3 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, washers and catalyst emissions — headlamp aim alone was recorded 69 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 23.7% in the 0-30k band and 28.6% in the 90-120k band, a 4.9-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 36.2% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 25.2% in 2021 to 23.1% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Cabriolet 25.4% cars avg 23.9% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.4% 104
2 Suspension 11.2% 63
3 Visibility 7.3% 41
4 Brakes 6.6% 37
5 Emissions & environmental 6.4% 36
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.5% 31
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.4% Suspension 11.2% Visibility 7.3% Brakes 6.6% Emissions & environmental 6.4% Body, structure & corrosion 5.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim69
2Washers39
3Catalyst emissions33
4Stop lamp30
5Headlamp25
6Position lamp23

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 36.2% 204
2 Suspension 26.1% 147
3 Tyres 20.0% 113
4 Lighting & signalling 15.6% 88
5 Other defects 9.9% 56
6 Emissions & environmental 9.6% 54

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 23.7% 30-60k 21.1% 60-90k 26.4% 90-120k 28.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 38 23.7%
30-60k 209 21.1%
60-90k 212 26.4%
90-120k 84 28.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 25.2% 17 yrs 26.7% 18 yrs 24.1% 19 yrs 27.1% 20 yrs 23.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 147 25.2%
2022 135 26.7%
2023 108 24.1%
2024 96 27.1%
2025 78 23.1%

What to check before buying a 2005 Cabriolet

On a 2005 Cabriolet, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

74.7% of the 564 2005 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 25.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Smart Cabriolet?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.4% of tests, followed by suspension (11.2%).

Does the 2005 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 23.7% in the 0-30k band to 28.6% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 564 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data