2008 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2008 Smart Cabriolet passed 75.3% of its 437 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (26.3% fail rate), the 2008 Cabriolet comes out 1.6pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

75%
Pass rate
437
MOT tests analysed
24.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
15
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.8% of tests against 9.4% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, headlamp aim and rigid brake pipes — coil spring alone was recorded 27 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2008 Cabriolet fails 26.8% of the time in the 0-30k band and 26.9% at 90-120k, a spread of only 0.1 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 30.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 25.8% in 2021 to 22.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Cabriolet 24.7% cars avg 22.5% National avg 26.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.8% 69
2 Suspension 9.4% 41
3 Brakes 7.3% 32
4 Tyres 4.8% 21
5 Visibility 4.8% 21
6 Body, structure & corrosion 4.6% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.8% Suspension 9.4% Brakes 7.3% Tyres 4.8% Visibility 4.8% Body, structure & corrosion 4.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring27
2Headlamp aim25
3Rigid brake pipes17
4Stop lamp16
5Position lamp15
6Service brake performance15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 30.9% 135
2 Tyres 22.2% 97
3 Suspension 11.9% 52
4 Lighting & signalling 9.4% 41
5 Visibility 5.9% 26
6 Other defects 5.0% 22

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 26.8% 30-60k 20.8% 60-90k 26.6% 90-120k 26.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 41 26.8%
30-60k 154 20.8%
60-90k 177 26.6%
90-120k 52 26.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 25.8% 14 yrs 23.0% 15 yrs 27.6% 16 yrs 24.4% 17 yrs 22.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 93 25.8%
2022 87 23.0%
2023 87 27.6%
2024 86 24.4%
2025 84 22.6%

What to check before buying a 2008 Cabriolet

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

75.3% of the 437 2008 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 24.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Smart Cabriolet?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.8% of tests, followed by suspension (9.4%).

Does the 2008 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 26.8% in the 0-30k band to 26.9% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 437 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data