2016 Mazda MX-5 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 22,110 MOT tests, the 2016 Mazda MX-5 recorded a 91.9% pass rate. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 10.8% of the time, so this is 2.7pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in brakes, visibility and tyres.

92%
Pass rate
22,110
MOT tests analysed
8.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (4.3%) and visibility (2.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are service brake performance, brake pads and wipers — service brake performance alone was recorded 588 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 27.9% versus 5.4%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 19.2% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 5.2% of tests failed in 2021 against 10.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 MX-5 8.1% coupes & convertibles avg 10.8% National avg 14.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Mazda MX-5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 4.3% 946
2 Visibility 2.4% 538
3 Tyres 2.2% 494
4 Lighting & signalling 2.0% 447
5 Suspension 1.2% 259
6 Emissions & environmental 0.6% 136
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 4.3% Visibility 2.4% Tyres 2.2% Lighting & signalling 2.0% Suspension 1.2% Emissions & environmental 0.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Mazda MX-5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Service brake performance588
2Brake pads481
3Wipers480
4Headlamp aim399
5Washers218
6Tread depth193

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Mazda MX-5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 19.2% 4,247
2 Tyres 16.7% 3,696
3 Suspension 7.3% 1,612
4 Visibility 3.1% 684
5 Other defects 2.0% 440
6 Lighting & signalling 1.6% 359

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 5.4% 30-60k 9.9% 60-90k 13.8% 90-120k 14.9% 120-150k 16.7% 150k+ 27.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 MX-5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 11,003 5.4%
30-60k 9,003 9.9%
60-90k 1,749 13.8%
90-120k 262 14.9%
120-150k 48 16.7%
150k+ 43 27.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 5.2% 6 yrs 7.2% 7 yrs 8.1% 8 yrs 9.8% 9 yrs 10.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 MX-5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 4,337 5.2%
2022 4,395 7.2%
2023 4,449 8.1%
2024 4,450 9.8%
2025 4,479 10.1%

What to check before buying a 2016 MX-5

On a 2016 MX-5, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Mazda MX-5s pass their MOT?

91.9% of the 22,110 2016 Mazda MX-5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 8.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Mazda MX-5?

Brakes, recorded in 4.3% of tests, followed by visibility (2.4%).

Does the 2016 MX-5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 5.4% in the 0-30k band to 27.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 22,110 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data