1994 Mazda MX-5 — MOT failures & pass rate

2,728 MOT tests on the 1994 Mazda MX-5 are in this dataset, and 76.1% of them passed. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 19.5% of the time, so this is 4.3pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

76%
Pass rate
2,728
MOT tests analysed
23.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
29.1
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (11.5%) and brakes (9.9%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, prescribed areas and headlamp aim — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 261 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 8.0% in the 0-30k band and 29.0% in the 150k+ band, a 21.0-point spread — more than double.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 26.8% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1994 MX-5 23.9% coupes & convertibles avg 19.5% National avg 23.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1994 Mazda MX-5
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 11.5% 313
2 Brakes 9.9% 271
3 Suspension 9.1% 249
4 Emissions & environmental 7.7% 211
5 Body, structure & corrosion 4.9% 134
6 Seat belts & restraints 4.5% 122
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 11.5% Brakes 9.9% Suspension 9.1% Emissions & environmental 7.7% Body, structure & corrosion 4.9% Seat belts & restraints 4.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1994 Mazda MX-5
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions261
2Prescribed areas192
3Headlamp aim166
4Component mounting prescribed areas140
5Service brake performance114
6Rbt (sp)112

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1994 Mazda MX-5
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.8% 731
2 Suspension 26.0% 709
3 Emissions & environmental 19.5% 531
4 Body, structure & corrosion 14.4% 394
5 Tyres 12.6% 344
6 Lighting & signalling 5.9% 160

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.0% 30-60k 13.6% 60-90k 19.8% 90-120k 23.9% 120-150k 29.4% 150k+ 29.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1994 MX-5
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 50 8.0%
30-60k 199 13.6%
60-90k 626 19.8%
90-120k 866 23.9%
120-150k 622 29.4%
150k+ 365 29.0%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1994 MX-5
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 511 24.3%
2022 519 26.6%
2023 483 21.9%
2024 629 23.1%
2025 586 23.5%

What to check before buying a 1994 MX-5

On a 1994 MX-5, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 11.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1994 Mazda MX-5s pass their MOT?

76.1% of the 2,728 1994 Mazda MX-5 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1994 Mazda MX-5?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 11.5% of tests, followed by brakes (9.9%).

Does the 1994 MX-5 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.0% in the 0-30k band to 29.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,728 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data