2006 Lexus Is 250 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2006 Lexus Is 250 passed 78.8% of its 480 recorded MOT tests. That is 6.1 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 27.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and emissions & environmental.

79%
Pass rate
480
MOT tests analysed
21.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
16.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 16.7% of all tests — 6.7 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, headlamp and position lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 45 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 17.9% in the 60-90k band and 25.5% in the 150k+ band, a 7.6-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 27.9% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 18.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 23.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Is 250 21.3% cars avg 23.5% National avg 27.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Lexus Is 250
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 16.7% 80
2 Brakes 10.0% 48
3 Emissions & environmental 6.0% 29
4 Tyres 6.0% 29
5 Suspension 3.1% 15
6 Visibility 2.9% 14
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 16.7% Brakes 10.0% Emissions & environmental 6.0% Tyres 6.0% Suspension 3.1% Visibility 2.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Lexus Is 250
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim45
2Headlamp43
3Position lamp27
4Catalyst emissions25
5Brake pads17
6Tread depth16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Lexus Is 250
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 27.9% 134
2 Tyres 26.7% 128
3 Suspension 17.1% 82
4 Lighting & signalling 11.0% 53
5 Other defects 10.4% 50
6 Body, structure & corrosion 10.0% 48

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 17.9% 90-120k 19.0% 120-150k 26.4% 150k+ 25.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Is 250
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 78 17.9%
90-120k 137 19.0%
120-150k 144 26.4%
150k+ 94 25.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 18.9% 16 yrs 15.7% 17 yrs 22.3% 18 yrs 27.5% 19 yrs 23.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Is 250
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 111 18.9%
2022 102 15.7%
2023 103 22.3%
2024 91 27.5%
2025 73 23.3%

What to check before buying a 2006 Is 250

On a 2006 Is 250, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 16.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Lexus Is 250s pass their MOT?

78.8% of the 480 2006 Lexus Is 250 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 21.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Lexus Is 250?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.7% of tests, followed by brakes (10.0%).

Does the 2006 Is 250 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.9% in the 60-90k band to 25.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 480 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data