2005 Lexus Is 250 — MOT failures & pass rate

286 MOT tests on the 2005 Lexus Is 250 are in this dataset, and 82.2% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.6% fail rate), the 2005 Is 250 comes out 9.8pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and emissions & environmental.

82%
Pass rate
286
MOT tests analysed
17.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
17.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.6% of tests against 8.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, position lamp and catalyst emissions — headlamp aim alone was recorded 27 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2005 Is 250 fails 15.0% of the time in the 60-90k band and 14.7% at 150k+, a spread of only 0.3 points.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 24.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 18.5% in 2021 to 15.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Is 250 17.8% cars avg 24.0% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Lexus Is 250
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.6% 39
2 Brakes 8.7% 25
3 Emissions & environmental 5.2% 15
4 Tyres 4.5% 13
5 Visibility 4.5% 13
6 Steering 1.8% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.6% Brakes 8.7% Emissions & environmental 5.2% Tyres 4.5% Visibility 4.5% Steering 1.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Lexus Is 250
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim27
2Position lamp16
3Catalyst emissions14
4Headlamp12
5Tread depth12
6Wipers11

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Lexus Is 250
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 24.8% 71
2 Brakes 22.4% 64
3 Other defects 17.1% 49
4 Lighting & signalling 12.9% 37
5 Suspension 11.5% 33
6 Body, structure & corrosion 11.2% 32

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 15.0% 90-120k 17.0% 120-150k 23.8% 150k+ 14.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Is 250
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 40 15.0%
90-120k 100 17.0%
120-150k 84 23.8%
150k+ 34 14.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 18.5% 17 yrs 18.8% 18 yrs 21.3% 19 yrs 13.7% 20 yrs 15.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Is 250
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 65 18.5%
2022 64 18.8%
2023 61 21.3%
2024 51 13.7%
2025 45 15.6%

What to check before buying a 2005 Is 250

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 13.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Lexus Is 250s pass their MOT?

82.2% of the 286 2005 Lexus Is 250 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 17.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Lexus Is 250?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.6% of tests, followed by brakes (8.7%).

Does the 2005 Is 250 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.0% in the 60-90k band to 14.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 286 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data