Kia Ceed MOT pass rate & common failures

743,305 MOT tests on the Kia Ceed (2006–2025) give it a 79.2% pass rate. Small family cars of a similar age fail 17.9% of the time, so this is 2.9pp worse than the group it competes with. Its most common failure areas are lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

79%
Pass rate
743,305
MOT tests analysed
20.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs small family cars of similar age
2006–2025
Model years covered

Best and worst Ceed years

Strongest year
2022

91.1% pass rate from 7,907 tests.

See the 2022 report
Weakest year
2007

70.1% pass rate from 19,524 tests.

See the 2007 report

Ranked across Ceed years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

Not every year is equal — 91.1% of 2022 examples pass against 70.1% of 2007 ones.

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.8% of tests against 7.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, tread depth and track rod end — position lamp alone was recorded 26,753 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 8.6% in the 0-30k band and 31.1% in the 150k+ band, a 22.5-point spread — more than double.

The hybrid cars hold up better: 11.9% fail against 22.1% for diesel, a 10.2-point gap across 465,498 tests.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 27.4% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Kia Ceed 20.8% small family cars avg 17.9%
Fail rate for the Kia Ceed against small family cars of a similar age.

By model year

Every Ceed model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Kia Ceed MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2007 19,524 70.1% 29.9% Lighting & signalling
2008 35,608 70.7% 29.3% Lighting & signalling
2009 51,392 72.0% 28.0% Lighting & signalling
2010 57,258 71.9% 28.1% Lighting & signalling
2011 50,778 71.9% 28.1% Lighting & signalling
2012 79,278 73.7% 26.3% Lighting & signalling
2013 71,939 76.0% 23.9% Lighting & signalling
2014 70,197 79.0% 21.1% Steering
2015 67,208 83.1% 16.9% Lighting & signalling
2016 56,894 85.0% 14.9% Tyres
2017 49,750 86.9% 13.1% Tyres
2018 53,344 88.6% 11.4% Tyres
2019 45,349 88.9% 11.1% Tyres
2020 14,628 89.2% 10.8% Tyres
2021 11,727 89.3% 10.7% Tyres
2022 7,907 91.1% 8.9% Tyres
2023 376 93.1% 6.9% Tyres
2024 134 98.5% 1.5% Brakes

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Kia Ceed
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 10.8% 80,163
2 Brakes 7.5% 55,428
3 Suspension 6.8% 50,858
4 Tyres 6.1% 45,225
5 Visibility 4.8% 35,276
6 Steering 3.7% 27,458
7 Body, structure & corrosion 1.4% 10,236
8 Emissions & environmental 1.4% 10,026
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 10.8% Brakes 7.5% Suspension 6.8% Tyres 6.1% Visibility 4.8% Steering 3.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Kia Ceed
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp26,753
2Tread depth25,661
3Track rod end25,564
4Headlamp aim23,105
5Stop lamp22,361
6Headlamp20,587
7Wipers20,344
8Washers20,294

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Kia Ceed
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 27.4% 203,506
2 Brakes 23.7% 176,081
3 Suspension 20.3% 150,580
4 Other defects 10.9% 81,091
5 Lighting & signalling 8.2% 60,555
6 Body, structure & corrosion 4.5% 33,742

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.6% 30-60k 14.8% 60-90k 22.4% 90-120k 27.6% 120-150k 30.1% 150k+ 31.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Kia Ceed
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 81,118 8.6%
30-60k 206,792 14.8%
60-90k 211,065 22.4%
90-120k 146,973 27.6%
120-150k 67,162 30.1%
150k+ 30,091 31.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 0 yrs 1.9% 1 yr 3.3% 2 yrs 7.8% 3 yrs 9.3% 4 yrs 10.4% 5 yrs 12.1% 6 yrs 13.0% 7 yrs 15.2% 8 yrs 18.1% 9 yrs 21.4% 10 yrs 23.8% 11 yrs 25.9% 12 yrs 27.1% 13 yrs 28.1% 14 yrs 29.2% 15 yrs 29.5% 16 yrs 29.7% 17 yrs 30.6% 18 yrs 29.8%
How the Ceed's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Kia Ceed
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 460,327 22.1%
Petrol 277,789 18.9%
Hybrid 5,171 11.9%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Kia Ceed
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 139,666 19.9%
2022 149,111 20.3%
2023 151,033 21.1%
2024 151,782 21.7%
2025 151,713 21.1%

What to check before buying a Kia Ceed

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Kia Ceed?

79.2% of the 743,305 Kia Ceed MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 20.8% fail rate, across model years 2006–2025.

What does the Kia Ceed most often fail its MOT on?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.8% of tests, then brakes (7.5%).

Which Ceed years are best and worst for MOT results?

2022 has the best pass rate at 91.1% and 2007 the weakest at 70.1%, from 7,907 and 19,524 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect Ceed MOT results?

Fail rates run at 8.6% for cars in the 0-30k band and 31.1% for 150k+, a 22.5-point difference.

Is the hybrid or diesel Ceed more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the hybrid fails 11.9% of the time against 22.1% for the diesel. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 743,305 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data