Volvo XC60 MOT pass rate & common failures

The Volvo XC60 appears in 598,432 MOT tests spanning model years 2006–2025, and 86.1% of them passed. Mid-size SUVs of a similar age fail 15.1% of the time, so this is 1.2pp better than the group it competes with. Its most common failure areas are lighting & signalling, tyres and suspension.

86%
Pass rate
598,432
MOT tests analysed
13.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs mid-size SUVs of similar age
2006–2025
Model years covered

Best and worst XC60 years

Strongest year
2022

93.1% pass rate from 7,937 tests.

See the 2022 report
Weakest year
2008

79.1% pass rate from 1,736 tests.

See the 2008 report

Ranked across XC60 years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

Not every year is equal — 93.1% of 2022 examples pass against 79.1% of 2008 ones.

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (4.7%) and tyres (4.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are coil spring, brake pads and tread depth — coil spring alone was recorded 21,875 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 22.4% versus 6.4%.

Split by fuel, diesel examples fail 7.3pp more often than hybrid ones (15.0% vs 7.6%) — worth weighing if you have a choice.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 24.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 12.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 14.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Volvo XC60 13.9% mid-size SUVs avg 15.1%
Fail rate for the Volvo XC60 against mid-size SUVs of a similar age.

By model year

Every XC60 model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Volvo XC60 MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2008 1,736 79.1% 20.8% Lighting & signalling
2009 19,074 79.4% 20.6% Suspension
2010 26,688 79.4% 20.6% Suspension
2011 28,022 79.9% 20.1% Suspension
2012 30,318 80.4% 19.6% Suspension
2013 31,415 82.0% 18.0% Suspension
2014 53,395 82.3% 17.7% Suspension
2015 74,342 84.6% 15.4% Lighting & signalling
2016 85,304 85.9% 14.1% Lighting & signalling
2017 83,512 88.3% 11.7% Tyres
2018 59,133 91.3% 8.7% Tyres
2019 49,683 91.1% 8.9% Tyres
2020 25,969 92.3% 7.7% Tyres
2021 21,267 92.6% 7.4% Tyres
2022 7,937 93.1% 6.9% Tyres
2023 611 96.2% 3.8% Tyres

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Volvo XC60
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 4.7% 28,086
2 Tyres 4.7% 27,823
3 Suspension 4.3% 25,650
4 Brakes 3.3% 19,983
5 Visibility 2.0% 12,007
6 Steering 1.3% 7,727
7 Emissions & environmental 0.9% 5,514
8 Body, structure & corrosion 0.7% 3,874
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 4.7% Tyres 4.7% Suspension 4.3% Brakes 3.3% Visibility 2.0% Steering 1.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Volvo XC60
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Coil spring21,875
2Brake pads17,483
3Tread depth15,324
4Headlamp aim12,091
5Wipers8,691
6Track rod end7,608
7Side repeaters5,156
8Malfunction indicator lamp4,845

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Volvo XC60
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 24.5% 146,743
2 Brakes 17.5% 104,940
3 Other defects 8.4% 50,037
4 Suspension 7.3% 43,838
5 Lighting & signalling 4.2% 25,380
6 Visibility 3.3% 19,932

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.4% 30-60k 10.3% 60-90k 15.0% 90-120k 18.4% 120-150k 20.9% 150k+ 22.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Volvo XC60
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 72,538 6.4%
30-60k 187,765 10.3%
60-90k 155,717 15.0%
90-120k 100,743 18.4%
120-150k 52,251 20.9%
150k+ 29,267 22.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 0 yrs 4.1% 1 yr 4.7% 2 yrs 5.3% 3 yrs 7.4% 4 yrs 8.3% 5 yrs 9.5% 6 yrs 11.3% 7 yrs 13.5% 8 yrs 15.8% 9 yrs 17.4% 10 yrs 18.6% 11 yrs 19.3% 12 yrs 19.4% 13 yrs 20.4% 14 yrs 20.9% 15 yrs 21.3% 16 yrs 23.0% 17 yrs 22.3%
How the XC60's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Volvo XC60
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 501,955 15.0%
Petrol 53,460 9.3%
Hybrid 43,006 7.6%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Volvo XC60
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 98,064 12.9%
2022 111,140 13.4%
2023 120,822 14.3%
2024 130,343 14.2%
2025 138,063 14.5%

What to check before buying a Volvo XC60

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Volvo XC60?

86.1% of the 598,432 Volvo XC60 MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 13.9% fail rate, across model years 2006–2025.

What does the Volvo XC60 most often fail its MOT on?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 4.7% of tests, then tyres (4.7%).

Which XC60 years are best and worst for MOT results?

2022 has the best pass rate at 93.1% and 2008 the weakest at 79.1%, from 7,937 and 1,736 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect XC60 MOT results?

Fail rates run at 6.4% for cars in the 0-30k band and 22.4% for 150k+, a 16.0-point difference.

Is the hybrid or diesel XC60 more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the hybrid fails 7.6% of the time against 15.0% for the diesel. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 598,432 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data