2010 Volvo S60 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 4,062 MOT tests, the 2010 Volvo S60 recorded an 82.0% pass rate. Against executive cars of a similar age (20.8% fail rate), the 2010 S60 comes out 2.8pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and tyres.

82%
Pass rate
4,062
MOT tests analysed
18.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (7.3%) and suspension (5.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, tread depth and shock absorbers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 139 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 19.5% versus 0.0%.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 26.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 S60 18.0% executive cars avg 20.8% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Volvo S60
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 7.3% 296
2 Suspension 5.7% 231
3 Tyres 5.7% 230
4 Brakes 5.1% 208
5 Visibility 2.8% 114
6 Steering 2.2% 90
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 7.3% Suspension 5.7% Tyres 5.7% Brakes 5.1% Visibility 2.8% Steering 2.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Volvo S60
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim139
2Tread depth121
3Shock absorbers112
4Brake pads111
5Track rod end88
6Headlamp69

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Volvo S60
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 26.8% 1,088
2 Suspension 22.2% 900
3 Brakes 19.8% 803
4 Other defects 9.1% 368
5 Lighting & signalling 7.3% 298
6 Visibility 4.7% 191

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 0.0% 30-60k 11.5% 60-90k 18.2% 90-120k 17.8% 120-150k 19.5% 150k+ 19.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 S60
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 37 0.0%
30-60k 278 11.5%
60-90k 924 18.2%
90-120k 1,212 17.8%
120-150k 892 19.5%
150k+ 717 19.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 17.5% 12 yrs 17.2% 13 yrs 17.0% 14 yrs 20.3% 15 yrs 18.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2010 S60
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 3,887 18.0%
Petrol 175 18.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 S60
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 901 17.5%
2022 860 17.2%
2023 798 17.0%
2024 782 20.3%
2025 721 18.0%

What to check before buying a 2010 S60

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 7.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Volvo S60s pass their MOT?

82.0% of the 4,062 2010 Volvo S60 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 18.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Volvo S60?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 7.3% of tests, followed by suspension (5.7%).

Does the 2010 S60 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 0.0% in the 0-30k band to 19.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,062 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data