Mercedes-Benz CLS MOT pass rate & common failures

146,976 MOT tests on the Mercedes-Benz CLS (2000–2022) give it an 81.3% pass rate. Against executive cars of a similar age (17.6% fail rate), the CLS comes out 1.1pp worse. Its most common failure areas are tyres, suspension and brakes.

81%
Pass rate
146,976
MOT tests analysed
18.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs executive cars of similar age
2000–2022
Model years covered

Best and worst CLS years

Strongest year
2018

87.5% pass rate from 5,668 tests.

See the 2018 report
Weakest year
2009

75.9% pass rate from 7,611 tests.

See the 2009 report

Ranked across CLS years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

Not every year is equal — 87.5% of 2018 examples pass against 75.9% of 2009 ones.

No single area dominates — tyres (8.2%) and suspension (6.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, tread depth and coil spring — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 5,427 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 23.3% versus 10.6%.

The hybrid cars hold up better: 14.5% fail against 18.8% for diesel, a 4.3-point gap across 130,733 tests.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 26.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Mercedes-Benz CLS 18.7% executive cars avg 17.6%
Fail rate for the Mercedes-Benz CLS against executive cars of a similar age.

By model year

Every CLS model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Mercedes-Benz CLS MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2005 6,369 79.7% 20.3% Suspension
2006 10,081 78.1% 21.9% Suspension
2007 12,091 77.0% 23.0% Suspension
2008 9,389 76.8% 23.2% Suspension
2009 7,611 75.9% 24.1% Suspension
2010 7,229 76.8% 23.2% Suspension
2011 7,400 81.2% 18.8% Tyres
2012 6,940 80.8% 19.2% Tyres
2013 19,035 80.5% 19.5% Tyres
2014 10,909 82.0% 18.0% Tyres
2015 17,033 84.8% 15.2% Tyres
2016 12,261 85.9% 14.1% Tyres
2017 8,626 86.7% 13.3% Tyres
2018 5,668 87.5% 12.5% Tyres
2019 5,128 86.5% 13.5% Tyres
2020 1,012 83.3% 16.7% Tyres
2021 139 82.7% 17.3% Road wheels

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Mercedes-Benz CLS
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 8.2% 12,026
2 Suspension 6.6% 9,723
3 Brakes 5.3% 7,861
4 Lighting & signalling 4.4% 6,503
5 Emissions & environmental 2.5% 3,670
6 Visibility 1.7% 2,476
7 Road wheels 1.2% 1,817
8 Steering 1.1% 1,557
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 8.2% Suspension 6.6% Brakes 5.3% Lighting & signalling 4.4% Emissions & environmental 2.5% Visibility 1.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Mercedes-Benz CLS
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes5,427
2Tread depth4,926
3Coil spring4,789
4Ball joint4,239
5Headlamp aim3,523
6Malfunction indicator lamp2,464
7Brake pads1,906
8Headlamp1,756

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Mercedes-Benz CLS
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.9% 39,586
2 Tyres 25.1% 36,873
3 Suspension 15.4% 22,571
4 Other defects 6.5% 9,534
5 Emissions & environmental 5.8% 8,555
6 Visibility 3.5% 5,131

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.6% 30-60k 14.2% 60-90k 18.4% 90-120k 21.3% 120-150k 22.8% 150k+ 23.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Mercedes-Benz CLS
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 9,685 10.6%
30-60k 31,694 14.2%
60-90k 40,183 18.4%
90-120k 33,289 21.3%
120-150k 19,882 22.8%
150k+ 12,159 23.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 10.4% 3 yrs 12.4% 4 yrs 12.3% 5 yrs 12.3% 6 yrs 14.0% 7 yrs 15.2% 8 yrs 16.3% 9 yrs 17.5% 10 yrs 18.2% 11 yrs 19.7% 12 yrs 21.3% 13 yrs 22.5% 14 yrs 23.4% 15 yrs 23.1% 16 yrs 22.4% 17 yrs 21.7% 18 yrs 21.5% 19 yrs 21.0% 20 yrs 18.9%
How the CLS's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Mercedes-Benz CLS
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 130,183 18.8%
Petrol 16,234 17.5%
Hybrid 550 14.5%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Mercedes-Benz CLS
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 30,902 18.4%
2022 31,277 18.5%
2023 30,045 18.4%
2024 28,365 19.3%
2025 26,387 18.8%

What to check before buying a Mercedes-Benz CLS

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Mercedes-Benz CLS?

81.3% of the 146,976 Mercedes-Benz CLS MOT tests in this dataset passed, an 18.7% fail rate, across model years 2000–2022.

What does the Mercedes-Benz CLS most often fail its MOT on?

Tyres, recorded in 8.2% of tests, then suspension (6.6%).

Which CLS years are best and worst for MOT results?

2018 has the best pass rate at 87.5% and 2009 the weakest at 75.9%, from 5,668 and 7,611 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect CLS MOT results?

Fail rates run at 10.6% for cars in the 0-30k band and 23.3% for 150k+, a 12.7-point difference.

Is the hybrid or diesel CLS more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the hybrid fails 14.5% of the time against 18.8% for the diesel. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 146,976 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data