1995 Toyota Previa — MOT failures & pass rate

547 MOT tests on the 1995 Toyota Previa are in this dataset, and 71.1% of them passed. Against MPVs of a similar age (31.8% fail rate), the 1995 Previa comes out 2.9pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and emissions & environmental.

71%
Pass rate
547
MOT tests analysed
28.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs MPVs of similar age
27.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (15.4%) and suspension (13.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, component mounting prescribed areas and wipers — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 74 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 35.0% versus 11.0%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 42.2% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 28.9% in 2021 to 20.0% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1995 Previa 28.9% MPVs avg 31.8% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1995 Toyota Previa
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.4% 84
2 Suspension 13.0% 71
3 Emissions & environmental 12.4% 68
4 Brakes 10.2% 56
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.0% 44
6 Visibility 7.3% 40
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.4% Suspension 13.0% Emissions & environmental 12.4% Brakes 10.2% Body, structure & corrosion 8.0% Visibility 7.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1995 Toyota Previa
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions74
2Component mounting prescribed areas68
3Wipers44
4Headlamp aim36
5Position lamp33
6Stop lamp24

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1995 Toyota Previa
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 42.2% 231
2 Brakes 34.9% 191
3 Emissions & environmental 24.9% 136
4 Tyres 22.5% 123
5 Body, structure & corrosion 17.4% 95
6 Other defects 14.1% 77

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 11.0% 90-120k 33.6% 120-150k 29.9% 150k+ 35.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1995 Previa
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 82 11.0%
90-120k 131 33.6%
120-150k 154 29.9%
150k+ 163 35.0%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1995 Previa
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 152 28.9%
2022 130 29.2%
2023 107 31.8%
2024 88 31.8%
2025 70 20.0%

What to check before buying a 1995 Previa

On a 1995 Previa, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 15.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1995 Toyota Previas pass their MOT?

71.1% of the 547 1995 Toyota Previa MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1995 Toyota Previa?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.4% of tests, followed by suspension (13.0%).

Does the 1995 Previa get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.0% in the 60-90k band to 35.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 547 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data