1996 Toyota Mr2 — MOT failures & pass rate

1,298 MOT tests on the 1996 Toyota Mr2 are in this dataset, and 72.8% of them passed. Against coupes & convertibles of a similar age (20.3% fail rate), the 1996 Mr2 comes out 6.9pp worse. Failures cluster in emissions & environmental, brakes and lighting & signalling.

73%
Pass rate
1,298
MOT tests analysed
27.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
26.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — emissions & environmental (15.9%) and brakes (13.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, component mounting prescribed areas and rbt (sp) — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 301 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 12.6% in the 30-60k band and 33.3% in the 150k+ band, a 20.7-point spread — more than double.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 23.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 33.3% in 2021 to 25.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1996 Mr2 27.2% coupes & convertibles avg 20.3% National avg 24.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1996 Toyota Mr2
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Emissions & environmental 15.9% 206
2 Brakes 13.2% 171
3 Lighting & signalling 9.1% 118
4 Suspension 8.0% 104
5 Body, structure & corrosion 5.6% 73
6 Visibility 3.6% 47
Share of tests failing on each category Emissions & environmental 15.9% Brakes 13.2% Lighting & signalling 9.1% Suspension 8.0% Body, structure & corrosion 5.6% Visibility 3.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1996 Toyota Mr2
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions301
2Component mounting prescribed areas104
3Rbt (sp)90
4Service brake performance66
5Headlamp aim60
6Prescribed areas55

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1996 Toyota Mr2
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 23.0% 299
2 Brakes 21.2% 275
3 Tyres 18.9% 246
4 Body, structure & corrosion 11.0% 143
5 Emissions & environmental 9.0% 117
6 Other defects 8.1% 105

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 12.6% 60-90k 24.9% 90-120k 30.5% 120-150k 26.8% 150k+ 33.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1996 Mr2
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 103 12.6%
60-90k 325 24.9%
90-120k 394 30.5%
120-150k 272 26.8%
150k+ 192 33.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1996 Mr2
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 297 33.3%
2022 263 29.3%
2023 238 20.6%
2024 246 25.6%
2025 254 25.6%

What to check before buying a 1996 Mr2

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: emissions & environmental accounted for 15.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1996 Toyota Mr2s pass their MOT?

72.8% of the 1,298 1996 Toyota Mr2 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1996 Toyota Mr2?

Emissions & environmental, recorded in 15.9% of tests, followed by brakes (13.2%).

Does the 1996 Mr2 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 12.6% in the 30-60k band to 33.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,298 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data