2005 Toyota Celica — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2005 Toyota Celica passed 74.1% of its 9,441 recorded MOT tests. Against coupes & convertibles of a similar age (22.2% fail rate), the 2005 Celica comes out 3.7pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

74%
Pass rate
9,441
MOT tests analysed
25.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
17.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.3% of tests against 11.1% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and headlamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 892 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 30.9% versus 20.4%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 33.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Celica 25.9% coupes & convertibles avg 22.2% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Toyota Celica
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.3% 1,448
2 Brakes 11.1% 1,044
3 Suspension 10.0% 941
4 Emissions & environmental 7.0% 656
5 Body, structure & corrosion 5.5% 518
6 Tyres 4.9% 465
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.3% Brakes 11.1% Suspension 10.0% Emissions & environmental 7.0% Body, structure & corrosion 5.5% Tyres 4.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Toyota Celica
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim892
2Catalyst emissions567
3Headlamp451
4Position lamp434
5Service brake performance401
6Coil spring396

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Toyota Celica
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.0% 3,118
2 Suspension 30.0% 2,834
3 Tyres 22.8% 2,156
4 Body, structure & corrosion 15.1% 1,429
5 Lighting & signalling 14.4% 1,361
6 Other defects 10.2% 959

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 20.4% 30-60k 15.6% 60-90k 23.5% 90-120k 26.2% 120-150k 28.3% 150k+ 30.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Celica
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 98 20.4%
30-60k 755 15.6%
60-90k 2,009 23.5%
90-120k 2,929 26.2%
120-150k 2,291 28.3%
150k+ 1,351 30.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 25.6% 17 yrs 25.6% 18 yrs 26.3% 19 yrs 26.5% 20 yrs 25.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Celica
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 2,309 25.6%
2022 2,091 25.6%
2023 1,904 26.3%
2024 1,641 26.5%
2025 1,496 25.9%

What to check before buying a 2005 Celica

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Toyota Celicas pass their MOT?

74.1% of the 9,441 2005 Toyota Celica MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 25.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Toyota Celica?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.3% of tests, followed by brakes (11.1%).

Does the 2005 Celica get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.4% in the 0-30k band to 30.9% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 9,441 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data