2018 Suzuki Celerio — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2018 Suzuki Celerio passed 93.4% of its 21,864 recorded MOT tests. City cars of a similar age fail 9.7% of the time, so this is 3.1pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in visibility, tyres and lighting & signalling.

93%
Pass rate
21,864
MOT tests analysed
6.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Visibility dominates the failure mix at 5.8% of all tests — 3.2 points clear of tyres, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, tread depth and headlamp aim — wipers alone was recorded 1,368 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 4.5% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 12.5% once past 120-150k — 2.7× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 20.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 4.5% of tests failed in 2021 against 9.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2018 Celerio 6.6% city cars avg 9.7% National avg 11.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2018 Suzuki Celerio
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Visibility 5.8% 1,266
2 Tyres 2.6% 563
3 Lighting & signalling 2.6% 560
4 Brakes 2.1% 457
5 Seat belts & restraints 0.4% 94
6 Suspension 0.3% 75
Share of tests failing on each category Visibility 5.8% Tyres 2.6% Lighting & signalling 2.6% Brakes 2.1% Seat belts & restraints 0.4% Suspension 0.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2018 Suzuki Celerio
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers1,368
2Tread depth399
3Headlamp aim335
4Washers282
5Brake pads121
6Stop lamp113

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2018 Suzuki Celerio
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 20.1% 4,403
2 Brakes 7.4% 1,628
3 Other defects 4.5% 973
4 Visibility 3.2% 694
5 Suspension 1.9% 415
6 Emissions & environmental 0.6% 125

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.5% 30-60k 10.1% 60-90k 13.6% 90-120k 15.1% 120-150k 12.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2018 Celerio
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 14,679 4.5%
30-60k 5,934 10.1%
60-90k 1,024 13.6%
90-120k 179 15.1%
120-150k 32 12.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 3 yrs 4.5% 4 yrs 5.9% 5 yrs 6.6% 6 yrs 6.6% 7 yrs 9.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2018 Celerio
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 4,393 4.5%
2022 4,383 5.9%
2023 4,382 6.6%
2024 4,261 6.6%
2025 4,445 9.3%

What to check before buying a 2018 Celerio

On a 2018 Celerio, visibility is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 5.8% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2018 Suzuki Celerios pass their MOT?

93.4% of the 21,864 2018 Suzuki Celerio MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 6.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2018 Suzuki Celerio?

Visibility, recorded in 5.8% of tests, followed by tyres (2.6%).

Does the 2018 Celerio get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.5% in the 0-30k band to 12.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 21,864 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data