2017 Suzuki Celerio — MOT failures & pass rate

34,201 MOT tests on the 2017 Suzuki Celerio are in this dataset, and 92.5% of them passed. That is 4.1 percentage points better than city cars of a similar age, which fail at 11.7%. Failures cluster in visibility, tyres and brakes.

92%
Pass rate
34,201
MOT tests analysed
7.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs city cars of similar age
6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: visibility, recorded in 6.0% of tests against 2.8% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, tread depth and headlamp aim — wipers alone was recorded 2,276 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 5.1% in the 0-30k band and 24.3% in the 150k+ band, a 19.3-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 21.6% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 5.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 9.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2017 Celerio 7.5% city cars avg 11.7% National avg 12.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2017 Suzuki Celerio
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Visibility 6.0% 2,069
2 Tyres 2.8% 945
3 Brakes 2.6% 899
4 Lighting & signalling 2.5% 857
5 Suspension 0.6% 219
6 Seat belts & restraints 0.4% 134
Share of tests failing on each category Visibility 6.0% Tyres 2.8% Brakes 2.6% Lighting & signalling 2.5% Suspension 0.6% Seat belts & restraints 0.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2017 Suzuki Celerio
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers2,276
2Tread depth609
3Headlamp aim478
4Washers454
5Rigid brake pipes275
6Stop lamp256

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2017 Suzuki Celerio
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 21.6% 7,372
2 Brakes 10.9% 3,746
3 Other defects 4.4% 1,516
4 Visibility 3.5% 1,215
5 Suspension 2.8% 955
6 Lighting & signalling 0.8% 271

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 5.1% 30-60k 9.5% 60-90k 13.9% 90-120k 18.1% 120-150k 21.9% 150k+ 24.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2017 Celerio
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 19,067 5.1%
30-60k 11,925 9.5%
60-90k 2,557 13.9%
90-120k 492 18.1%
120-150k 96 21.9%
150k+ 37 24.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 4 yrs 5.9% 5 yrs 6.9% 6 yrs 7.2% 7 yrs 8.5% 8 yrs 9.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2017 Celerio
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 6,816 5.9%
2022 6,833 6.9%
2023 6,864 7.2%
2024 6,825 8.5%
2025 6,863 9.3%

What to check before buying a 2017 Celerio

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: visibility accounted for 6.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2017 Suzuki Celerios pass their MOT?

92.5% of the 34,201 2017 Suzuki Celerio MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 7.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2017 Suzuki Celerio?

Visibility, recorded in 6.0% of tests, followed by tyres (2.8%).

Does the 2017 Celerio get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 5.1% in the 0-30k band to 24.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 34,201 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data