2005 Smart Smart Roadster — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 527 MOT tests, the 2005 Smart Smart Roadster recorded an 80.3% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (27.6% fail rate), the 2005 Smart Roadster comes out 7.9pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

80%
Pass rate
527
MOT tests analysed
19.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
17.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.3% of tests against 7.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are individual direction indicators, horn and track rod end — individual direction indicators alone was recorded 25 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 15.9% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 25.5% once past 120-150k.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 36.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Smart Roadster 19.7% cars avg 24.0% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Smart Smart Roadster
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.3% 70
2 Suspension 7.0% 37
3 Brakes 5.5% 29
4 Tyres 3.2% 17
5 Body, structure & corrosion 3.0% 16
6 Visibility 2.3% 12
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.3% Suspension 7.0% Brakes 5.5% Tyres 3.2% Body, structure & corrosion 3.0% Visibility 2.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Smart Smart Roadster
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Individual direction indicators25
2Horn18
3Track rod end14
4Rigid brake pipes14
5Stop lamp13
6Position lamp13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Smart Smart Roadster
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 36.0% 190
2 Suspension 24.7% 130
3 Tyres 15.8% 83
4 Lighting & signalling 15.8% 83
5 Emissions & environmental 10.8% 57
6 Other defects 8.0% 42

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 15.9% 60-90k 19.8% 90-120k 21.1% 120-150k 25.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Smart Roadster
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 107 15.9%
60-90k 187 19.8%
90-120k 152 21.1%
120-150k 47 25.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 23.5% 17 yrs 16.8% 18 yrs 12.8% 19 yrs 21.9% 20 yrs 23.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Smart Roadster
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 115 23.5%
2022 113 16.8%
2023 94 12.8%
2024 105 21.9%
2025 100 23.0%

What to check before buying a 2005 Smart Roadster

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 13.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Smart Smart Roadsters pass their MOT?

80.3% of the 527 2005 Smart Smart Roadster MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Smart Smart Roadster?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.3% of tests, followed by suspension (7.0%).

Does the 2005 Smart Roadster get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.9% in the 30-60k band to 25.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 527 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data