2004 Smart Smart Roadster — MOT failures & pass rate

518 MOT tests on the 2004 Smart Smart Roadster are in this dataset, and 76.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), the 2004 Smart Roadster comes out 4.5pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

77%
Pass rate
518
MOT tests analysed
23.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
18.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 14.7% of all tests — 5.8 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are individual direction indicators, track rod end and wipers — individual direction indicators alone was recorded 25 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 33.3% versus 18.6%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 36.7% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Smart Roadster 23.2% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Smart Smart Roadster
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.7% 76
2 Suspension 8.9% 46
3 Brakes 7.7% 40
4 Visibility 5.4% 28
5 Steering 3.5% 18
6 Tyres 3.5% 18
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.7% Suspension 8.9% Brakes 7.7% Visibility 5.4% Steering 3.5% Tyres 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Smart Smart Roadster
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Individual direction indicators25
2Track rod end24
3Wipers23
4Headlamp22
5Position lamp21
6Service brake performance14

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Smart Smart Roadster
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 36.7% 190
2 Suspension 25.3% 131
3 Tyres 18.9% 98
4 Lighting & signalling 17.8% 92
5 Emissions & environmental 11.4% 59
6 Other defects 8.7% 45

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 18.6% 60-90k 20.7% 90-120k 27.9% 120-150k 33.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Smart Roadster
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 97 18.6%
60-90k 203 20.7%
90-120k 129 27.9%
120-150k 48 33.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 24.1% 18 yrs 22.2% 19 yrs 24.8% 20 yrs 20.4% 21 yrs 24.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Smart Roadster
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 112 24.1%
2022 117 22.2%
2023 109 24.8%
2024 93 20.4%
2025 87 24.1%

What to check before buying a 2004 Smart Roadster

On a 2004 Smart Roadster, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Smart Smart Roadsters pass their MOT?

76.8% of the 518 2004 Smart Smart Roadster MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Smart Smart Roadster?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.7% of tests, followed by suspension (8.9%).

Does the 2004 Smart Roadster get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 18.6% in the 30-60k band to 33.3% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 518 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data