2002 Smart City — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2002 Smart City passed 72.2% of its 752 recorded MOT tests. That is effectively the same as all cars of a similar age (27.5% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

72%
Pass rate
752
MOT tests analysed
27.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.7% of tests against 11.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and stop lamp — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 80 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2002 City fails 30.8% of the time in the 0-30k band and 29.4% at 90-120k, a spread of only 1.4 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 26.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 29.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 33.0% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 City 27.8% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Smart City
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.7% 133
2 Suspension 11.0% 83
3 Visibility 8.2% 62
4 Emissions & environmental 8.2% 62
5 Brakes 7.7% 58
6 Tyres 5.5% 41
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.7% Suspension 11.0% Visibility 8.2% Emissions & environmental 8.2% Brakes 7.7% Tyres 5.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Smart City
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions80
2Headlamp aim58
3Stop lamp50
4Washers46
5Headlamp37
6Pins and bushes33

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Smart City
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 26.5% 199
2 Tyres 24.1% 181
3 Suspension 21.7% 163
4 Emissions & environmental 18.5% 139
5 Lighting & signalling 15.2% 114
6 Other defects 7.4% 56

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 30.8% 30-60k 25.2% 60-90k 28.5% 90-120k 29.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 City
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 39 30.8%
30-60k 254 25.2%
60-90k 288 28.5%
90-120k 143 29.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 29.3% 20 yrs 25.5% 21 yrs 26.3% 22 yrs 26.5% 23 yrs 33.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 City
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 188 29.3%
2022 184 25.5%
2023 156 26.3%
2024 121 26.5%
2025 103 33.0%

What to check before buying a 2002 City

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 17.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Smart Citys pass their MOT?

72.2% of the 752 2002 Smart City MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Smart City?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.7% of tests, followed by suspension (11.0%).

Does the 2002 City get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 30.8% in the 0-30k band to 29.4% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 752 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data