2012 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 267 MOT tests, the 2012 Smart Cabriolet recorded an 80.5% pass rate. That is 2.3 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 21.8%. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and tyres.

81%
Pass rate
267
MOT tests analysed
19.5%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
11
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (9.0%) and lighting & signalling (9.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are service brake performance, headlamp aim and tread depth — service brake performance alone was recorded 15 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 27.8% versus 10.3%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 24.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 14.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 27.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2012 Cabriolet 19.5% cars avg 18.6% National avg 21.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2012 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 9.0% 24
2 Lighting & signalling 9.0% 24
3 Tyres 5.2% 14
4 Suspension 4.9% 13
5 Visibility 3.4% 9
6 Emissions & environmental 1.9% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 9.0% Lighting & signalling 9.0% Tyres 5.2% Suspension 4.9% Visibility 3.4% Emissions & environmental 1.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2012 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Service brake performance15
2Headlamp aim11
3Tread depth11
4Rigid brake pipes9
5Headlamp8
6Stop lamp8

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2012 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.3% 65
2 Tyres 24.3% 65
3 Suspension 10.5% 28
4 Other defects 9.4% 25
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.5% 20
6 Emissions & environmental 3.8% 10

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.3% 30-60k 19.6% 60-90k 20.4% 90-120k 27.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2012 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 39 10.3%
30-60k 92 19.6%
60-90k 98 20.4%
90-120k 36 27.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 9 yrs 14.0% 10 yrs 16.4% 11 yrs 20.0% 12 yrs 19.2% 13 yrs 27.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2012 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 50 14.0%
2022 55 16.4%
2023 55 20.0%
2024 52 19.2%
2025 55 27.3%

What to check before buying a 2012 Cabriolet

On a 2012 Cabriolet, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 9.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2012 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

80.5% of the 267 2012 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2012 Smart Cabriolet?

Brakes, recorded in 9.0% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (9.0%).

Does the 2012 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.3% in the 0-30k band to 27.8% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 267 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data