2003 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

996 MOT tests on the 2003 Smart Cabriolet are in this dataset, and 76.1% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 27.7% of the time, so this is 3.8pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and suspension.

76%
Pass rate
996
MOT tests analysed
23.9%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
19.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 17.4% of all tests — 7.1 points clear of visibility, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and washers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 100 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 23.3% versus 11.6%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 28.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 Cabriolet 23.9% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 17.4% 173
2 Visibility 10.2% 102
3 Suspension 7.8% 78
4 Emissions & environmental 7.3% 73
5 Brakes 6.6% 66
6 Body, structure & corrosion 4.8% 48
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 17.4% Visibility 10.2% Suspension 7.8% Emissions & environmental 7.3% Brakes 6.6% Body, structure & corrosion 4.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim100
2Catalyst emissions90
3Washers84
4Stop lamp52
5Wipers50
6Headlamp45

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.9% 288
2 Tyres 25.6% 255
3 Suspension 21.0% 209
4 Lighting & signalling 15.1% 150
5 Emissions & environmental 11.8% 117
6 Other defects 7.8% 78

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 11.6% 30-60k 25.0% 60-90k 24.1% 90-120k 25.1% 120-150k 23.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 69 11.6%
30-60k 292 25.0%
60-90k 410 24.1%
90-120k 171 25.1%
120-150k 43 23.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 25.1% 19 yrs 22.7% 20 yrs 23.7% 21 yrs 23.7% 22 yrs 24.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 271 25.1%
2022 225 22.7%
2023 207 23.7%
2024 169 23.7%
2025 124 24.2%

What to check before buying a 2003 Cabriolet

On a 2003 Cabriolet, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 17.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

76.1% of the 996 2003 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Smart Cabriolet?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 17.4% of tests, followed by visibility (10.2%).

Does the 2003 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.6% in the 0-30k band to 23.3% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 996 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data