2002 Smart Cabriolet — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2002 Smart Cabriolet passed 72.8% of its 477 recorded MOT tests. That is effectively the same as all cars of a similar age (27.5% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, emissions & environmental and suspension.

73%
Pass rate
477
MOT tests analysed
27.3%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.8% of tests against 11.1% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and stop lamp — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 69 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 6.3% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 33.8% once past 90-120k — 5.4× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 28.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Cabriolet 27.3% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 16.8% 80
2 Emissions & environmental 11.1% 53
3 Suspension 10.7% 51
4 Brakes 6.9% 33
5 Tyres 6.3% 30
6 Visibility 5.7% 27
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 16.8% Emissions & environmental 11.1% Suspension 10.7% Brakes 6.9% Tyres 6.3% Visibility 5.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Smart Cabriolet
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions69
2Headlamp aim57
3Stop lamp33
4Position lamp28
5Tread depth24
6Washers21

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Smart Cabriolet
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.3% 135
2 Suspension 26.6% 127
3 Tyres 24.5% 117
4 Emissions & environmental 18.0% 86
5 Lighting & signalling 15.5% 74
6 Body, structure & corrosion 6.3% 30

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.3% 30-60k 18.6% 60-90k 29.9% 90-120k 33.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Cabriolet
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 32 6.3%
30-60k 118 18.6%
60-90k 207 29.9%
90-120k 74 33.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 27.9% 20 yrs 25.4% 21 yrs 28.4% 22 yrs 26.3% 23 yrs 28.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Cabriolet
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 122 27.9%
2022 110 25.4%
2023 95 28.4%
2024 80 26.3%
2025 70 28.6%

What to check before buying a 2002 Cabriolet

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 16.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Smart Cabriolets pass their MOT?

72.8% of the 477 2002 Smart Cabriolet MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Smart Cabriolet?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 16.8% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (11.1%).

Does the 2002 Cabriolet get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.3% in the 0-30k band to 33.8% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 477 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data