2010 Renault Master — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2010 Renault Master passed 73.5% of its 4,814 recorded MOT tests. That is 1.1 percentage points better than vans of a similar age, which fail at 27.5%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

74%
Pass rate
4,814
MOT tests analysed
26.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs vans of similar age
13
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (14.7%) and brakes (13.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), joints and ball joint — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 389 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2010 Master fails 25.5% of the time in the 0-30k band and 27.3% at 150k+, a spread of only 1.8 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 29.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Master 26.5% vans avg 27.5% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Renault Master
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.7% 709
2 Brakes 13.5% 650
3 Suspension 7.6% 364
4 Body, structure & corrosion 6.8% 327
5 Visibility 5.5% 265
6 Tyres 2.8% 135
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.7% Brakes 13.5% Suspension 7.6% Body, structure & corrosion 6.8% Visibility 5.5% Tyres 2.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Renault Master
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)389
2Joints259
3Ball joint243
4Position lamp226
5Service brake performance216
6Headlamp aim208

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Renault Master
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 29.1% 1,402
2 Suspension 21.3% 1,028
3 Tyres 16.3% 784
4 Lighting & signalling 12.1% 581
5 Emissions & environmental 7.0% 335
6 Body, structure & corrosion 6.5% 312

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 25.5% 30-60k 25.0% 60-90k 26.4% 90-120k 27.1% 120-150k 26.0% 150k+ 27.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Master
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 310 25.5%
30-60k 875 25.0%
60-90k 815 26.4%
90-120k 687 27.1%
120-150k 565 26.0%
150k+ 1,537 27.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 25.8% 12 yrs 25.5% 13 yrs 26.1% 14 yrs 28.2% 15 yrs 26.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Master
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 982 25.8%
2022 966 25.5%
2023 962 26.1%
2024 989 28.2%
2025 915 26.8%

What to check before buying a 2010 Master

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 14.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Renault Masters pass their MOT?

73.5% of the 4,814 2010 Renault Master MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Renault Master?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.7% of tests, followed by brakes (13.5%).

Does the 2010 Master get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.5% in the 0-30k band to 27.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,814 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data