2009 Renault Master — MOT failures & pass rate

4,940 MOT tests on the 2009 Renault Master are in this dataset, and 73.6% of them passed. That is 1.8 percentage points better than vans of a similar age, which fail at 28.2%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

74%
Pass rate
4,940
MOT tests analysed
26.4%
Fail rate
better than
vs vans of similar age
13.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (14.5%) and brakes (14.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), ball joint and service brake performance — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 431 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 17.9% in the 0-30k band and 29.8% in the 150k+ band, a 11.9-point spread.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 28.6% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Master 26.4% vans avg 28.2% National avg 25.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Renault Master
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.5% 717
2 Brakes 14.1% 699
3 Suspension 8.4% 417
4 Visibility 5.5% 270
5 Body, structure & corrosion 4.9% 242
6 Steering 3.7% 183
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.5% Brakes 14.1% Suspension 8.4% Visibility 5.5% Body, structure & corrosion 4.9% Steering 3.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Renault Master
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)431
2Ball joint289
3Service brake performance247
4Headlamp aim234
5Position lamp221
6Wipers206

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Renault Master
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.6% 1,413
2 Suspension 22.7% 1,123
3 Tyres 16.4% 812
4 Lighting & signalling 12.0% 593
5 Other defects 8.9% 438
6 Emissions & environmental 8.0% 397

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 17.9% 30-60k 20.1% 60-90k 26.7% 90-120k 27.4% 120-150k 28.8% 150k+ 29.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Master
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 357 17.9%
30-60k 864 20.1%
60-90k 767 26.7%
90-120k 639 27.4%
120-150k 732 28.8%
150k+ 1,528 29.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 25.4% 13 yrs 26.0% 14 yrs 26.0% 15 yrs 28.1% 16 yrs 26.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Master
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,026 25.4%
2022 1,018 26.0%
2023 995 26.0%
2024 998 28.1%
2025 903 26.4%

What to check before buying a 2009 Master

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 14.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Renault Masters pass their MOT?

73.6% of the 4,940 2009 Renault Master MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.4% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Renault Master?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.5% of tests, followed by brakes (14.1%).

Does the 2009 Master get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 17.9% in the 0-30k band to 29.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,940 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data