2010 Nissan Tiida — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,270 MOT tests, the 2010 Nissan Tiida recorded a 66.9% pass rate. That is 8.8 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.3%. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

67%
Pass rate
1,270
MOT tests analysed
33.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
12.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 21.1% of tests against 15.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, pins and bushes and position lamp — ball joint alone was recorded 139 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 26.9% in the 30-60k band and 38.2% in the 120-150k band, a 11.3-point spread.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 42.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 31.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 37.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Tiida 33.1% cars avg 20.7% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Nissan Tiida
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 21.1% 268
2 Lighting & signalling 15.5% 197
3 Brakes 15.3% 195
4 Visibility 7.0% 89
5 Body, structure & corrosion 6.5% 83
6 Emissions & environmental 6.5% 83
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 21.1% Lighting & signalling 15.5% Brakes 15.3% Visibility 7.0% Body, structure & corrosion 6.5% Emissions & environmental 6.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Nissan Tiida
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint139
2Pins and bushes115
3Position lamp103
4Exhaust system85
5Coil spring83
6Rigid brake pipes73

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Nissan Tiida
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 42.8% 543
2 Brakes 41.2% 523
3 Tyres 24.6% 312
4 Body, structure & corrosion 17.0% 216
5 Lighting & signalling 10.8% 137
6 Other defects 10.6% 135

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 26.9% 60-90k 34.8% 90-120k 36.2% 120-150k 38.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Tiida
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 327 26.9%
60-90k 543 34.8%
90-120k 257 36.2%
120-150k 89 38.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 31.3% 12 yrs 30.3% 13 yrs 35.0% 14 yrs 32.3% 15 yrs 37.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Tiida
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 288 31.3%
2022 271 30.3%
2023 274 35.0%
2024 229 32.3%
2025 208 37.5%

What to check before buying a 2010 Tiida

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 21.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Nissan Tiidas pass their MOT?

66.9% of the 1,270 2010 Nissan Tiida MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 33.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Nissan Tiida?

Suspension, recorded in 21.1% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (15.5%).

Does the 2010 Tiida get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 26.9% in the 30-60k band to 38.2% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,270 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data