2009 Nissan Tiida — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2009 Nissan Tiida passed 68.0% of its 1,994 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (25.3% fail rate), the 2009 Tiida comes out 6.7pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

68%
Pass rate
1,994
MOT tests analysed
32.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
13.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (19.6%) and lighting & signalling (17.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, position lamp and coil spring — ball joint alone was recorded 192 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 37.0% versus 25.0%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 38.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 31.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 34.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Tiida 32.0% cars avg 21.6% National avg 25.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Nissan Tiida
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 19.6% 391
2 Lighting & signalling 17.3% 346
3 Brakes 12.6% 251
4 Visibility 6.9% 138
5 Body, structure & corrosion 5.8% 115
6 Tyres 5.2% 103
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 19.6% Lighting & signalling 17.3% Brakes 12.6% Visibility 6.9% Body, structure & corrosion 5.8% Tyres 5.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Nissan Tiida
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint192
2Position lamp183
3Coil spring144
4Pins and bushes137
5Exhaust system99
6Rigid brake pipes87

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Nissan Tiida
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 38.0% 757
2 Brakes 37.9% 756
3 Tyres 28.5% 568
4 Body, structure & corrosion 17.0% 339
5 Lighting & signalling 11.0% 220
6 Other defects 10.8% 215

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 25.0% 30-60k 28.7% 60-90k 31.9% 90-120k 35.4% 120-150k 37.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Tiida
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 84 25.0%
30-60k 443 28.7%
60-90k 857 31.9%
90-120k 447 35.4%
120-150k 138 37.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 31.1% 13 yrs 30.5% 14 yrs 32.0% 15 yrs 32.9% 16 yrs 34.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Tiida
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 479 31.1%
2022 436 30.5%
2023 412 32.0%
2024 362 32.9%
2025 305 34.4%

What to check before buying a 2009 Tiida

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 19.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Nissan Tiidas pass their MOT?

68.0% of the 1,994 2009 Nissan Tiida MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Nissan Tiida?

Suspension, recorded in 19.6% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (17.3%).

Does the 2009 Tiida get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.0% in the 0-30k band to 37.0% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,994 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data