2010 Nissan Serena — MOT failures & pass rate

1,335 MOT tests on the 2010 Nissan Serena are in this dataset, and 83.4% of them passed. Against MPVs of a similar age (26.5% fail rate), the 2010 Serena comes out 9.9pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and tyres.

83%
Pass rate
1,335
MOT tests analysed
16.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs MPVs of similar age
13.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 12.3% of all tests — 8.9 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, position lamp and track rod end — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 94 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 9.9% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 25.0% once past 150k — 2.5× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 20.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 8.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 20.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Serena 16.6% MPVs avg 26.5% National avg 24.9%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Nissan Serena
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 12.3% 164
2 Suspension 3.4% 45
3 Tyres 3.4% 45
4 Brakes 3.4% 45
5 Visibility 3.3% 44
6 Steering 2.3% 30
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 12.3% Suspension 3.4% Tyres 3.4% Brakes 3.4% Visibility 3.3% Steering 2.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Nissan Serena
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp94
2Position lamp52
3Track rod end44
4Wipers34
5Brake pads31
6Headlamp aim31

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Nissan Serena
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 20.5% 274
2 Tyres 18.4% 246
3 Suspension 16.2% 216
4 Lighting & signalling 9.9% 132
5 Steering 8.8% 118
6 Other defects 7.8% 104

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 9.9% 60-90k 15.5% 90-120k 22.3% 120-150k 22.1% 150k+ 25.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Serena
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 253 9.9%
60-90k 646 15.5%
90-120k 300 22.3%
120-150k 95 22.1%
150k+ 32 25.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 8.3% 12 yrs 13.0% 13 yrs 16.6% 14 yrs 18.7% 15 yrs 20.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Serena
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 156 8.3%
2022 224 13.0%
2023 295 16.6%
2024 321 18.7%
2025 339 20.9%

What to check before buying a 2010 Serena

On a 2010 Serena, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 12.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Nissan Serenas pass their MOT?

83.4% of the 1,335 2010 Nissan Serena MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 16.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Nissan Serena?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.3% of tests, followed by suspension (3.4%).

Does the 2010 Serena get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.9% in the 30-60k band to 25.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,335 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data