2009 Nissan Serena — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,004 MOT tests, the 2009 Nissan Serena recorded an 83.5% pass rate. That is 11.3 percentage points better than MPVs of a similar age, which fail at 27.8%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and visibility.

83%
Pass rate
1,004
MOT tests analysed
16.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs MPVs of similar age
14.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 12.3% of all tests — 7.8 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, headlamp aim and track rod end — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 62 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 19.1% versus 12.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 19.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 13.9% of tests failed in 2021 against 20.0% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Serena 16.5% MPVs avg 27.8% National avg 25.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Nissan Serena
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 12.3% 123
2 Suspension 4.5% 45
3 Visibility 3.5% 35
4 Brakes 3.5% 35
5 Tyres 3.5% 35
6 Steering 2.4% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 12.3% Suspension 4.5% Visibility 3.5% Brakes 3.5% Tyres 3.5% Steering 2.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Nissan Serena
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp62
2Headlamp aim38
3Track rod end34
4Brake pads33
5Tread depth23
6Wipers20

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Nissan Serena
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 19.3% 194
2 Brakes 19.1% 192
3 Suspension 16.9% 170
4 Steering 11.3% 113
5 Other defects 9.5% 95
6 Lighting & signalling 8.1% 81

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 12.2% 60-90k 15.8% 90-120k 21.5% 120-150k 19.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Serena
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 230 12.2%
60-90k 476 15.8%
90-120k 223 21.5%
120-150k 42 19.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 13.9% 13 yrs 14.6% 14 yrs 15.3% 15 yrs 16.9% 16 yrs 20.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Serena
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 122 13.9%
2022 171 14.6%
2023 223 15.3%
2024 243 16.9%
2025 245 20.0%

What to check before buying a 2009 Serena

On a 2009 Serena, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 12.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Nissan Serenas pass their MOT?

83.5% of the 1,004 2009 Nissan Serena MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 16.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Nissan Serena?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.3% of tests, followed by suspension (4.5%).

Does the 2009 Serena get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 12.2% in the 30-60k band to 19.1% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,004 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data