Nissan Juke MOT pass rate & common failures

The Nissan Juke appears in 1,812,201 MOT tests spanning model years 2001–2025, and 80.9% of them passed. That is 2.8 percentage points worse than small SUVs of a similar age, which fail at 16.3%. Its most common failure areas are suspension, visibility and brakes.

81%
Pass rate
1,812,201
MOT tests analysed
19.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs small SUVs of similar age
2001–2025
Model years covered

Best and worst Juke years

Strongest year
2023

95.2% pass rate from 1,798 tests.

See the 2023 report
Weakest year
2010

71.5% pass rate from 32,504 tests.

See the 2010 report

Ranked across Juke years with at least 1,000 tests. Older cars fail more simply because they are older — compare years close together in age before drawing conclusions.

What the MOT record shows

Not every year is equal — 95.2% of 2023 examples pass against 71.5% of 2010 ones.

Suspension dominates the failure mix at 8.9% of all tests — 3.3 points clear of visibility, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, wipers and track rod end — ball joint alone was recorded 126,948 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 32.2% versus 7.3%.

Split by fuel, diesel examples fail 19.5pp more often than hybrid ones (23.6% vs 4.1%) — worth weighing if you have a choice.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 27.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 16.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 20.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmark (lower is better) Nissan Juke 19.1% small SUVs avg 16.3%
Fail rate for the Nissan Juke against small SUVs of a similar age.

By model year

Every Juke model year with a usable sample. Years with their own detailed report are linked.

Nissan Juke MOT results by model year
Year Tests Pass rate Fail rate Most common failure
2010 32,504 71.5% 28.5% Suspension
2011 131,670 72.2% 27.8% Suspension
2012 177,365 73.4% 26.6% Suspension
2013 232,510 73.4% 26.6% Suspension
2014 234,460 77.1% 22.9% Suspension
2015 233,851 80.3% 19.7% Suspension
2016 218,295 84.1% 15.9% Suspension
2017 211,869 87.5% 12.4% Visibility
2018 132,558 90.0% 10.0% Visibility
2019 85,695 90.4% 9.6% Visibility
2020 58,220 92.0% 8.0% Visibility
2021 42,578 93.1% 6.9% Visibility
2022 18,764 95.0% 5.0% Tyres
2023 1,798 95.2% 4.8% Tyres
2024 48 97.9% 2.1% Lighting & signalling

Most common failures (all years)

Most common MOT failure areas — Nissan Juke
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 8.9% 161,109
2 Visibility 5.6% 101,883
3 Brakes 5.2% 93,886
4 Lighting & signalling 5.0% 90,940
5 Tyres 4.6% 83,823
6 Steering 3.8% 68,970
7 Emissions & environmental 1.9% 35,063
8 Body, structure & corrosion 1.6% 29,800
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 8.9% Visibility 5.6% Brakes 5.2% Lighting & signalling 5.0% Tyres 4.6% Steering 3.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category, across all model years.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — Nissan Juke
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint126,948
2Wipers81,472
3Track rod end77,629
4Tread depth55,605
5Brake pads54,768
6Washers41,419
7Headlamp aim40,742
8Pins and bushes35,672

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — Nissan Juke
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 27.1% 491,539
2 Brakes 23.5% 426,252
3 Suspension 15.2% 274,837
4 Other defects 10.1% 183,271
5 Steering 4.5% 81,628
6 Emissions & environmental 4.5% 81,362

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 7.3% 30-60k 15.6% 60-90k 25.2% 90-120k 30.0% 120-150k 31.3% 150k+ 32.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — Nissan Juke
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 349,445 7.3%
30-60k 660,728 15.6%
60-90k 510,146 25.2%
90-120k 219,609 30.0%
120-150k 57,844 31.3%
150k+ 13,796 32.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 1 yr 6.0% 2 yrs 4.4% 3 yrs 6.1% 4 yrs 8.9% 5 yrs 10.2% 6 yrs 12.4% 7 yrs 15.7% 8 yrs 20.1% 9 yrs 23.2% 10 yrs 25.6% 11 yrs 27.3% 12 yrs 28.3% 13 yrs 28.7% 14 yrs 29.4% 15 yrs 30.0%
How the Juke's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — Nissan Juke
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 1,262,911 17.2%
Diesel 545,136 23.6%
Hybrid 4,152 4.1%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — Nissan Juke
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 311,220 16.1%
2022 340,795 17.9%
2023 365,758 19.5%
2024 388,454 20.5%
2025 405,974 20.6%

What to check before buying a Nissan Juke

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Nissan Juke?

80.9% of the 1,812,201 Nissan Juke MOT tests in this dataset passed, a 19.1% fail rate, across model years 2001–2025.

What does the Nissan Juke most often fail its MOT on?

Suspension, recorded in 8.9% of tests, then visibility (5.6%).

Which Juke years are best and worst for MOT results?

2023 has the best pass rate at 95.2% and 2010 the weakest at 71.5%, from 1,798 and 32,504 tests respectively.

How much does mileage affect Juke MOT results?

Fail rates run at 7.3% for cars in the 0-30k band and 32.2% for 150k+, a 24.9-point difference.

Is the hybrid or diesel Juke more reliable at MOT time?

On MOT-testable defects the hybrid fails 4.1% of the time against 23.6% for the diesel. This covers testable items only, not engine or gearbox reliability.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,812,201 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data