Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Nissan Juke
On MOT-testable defects, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (fail rate 12.6%) performed better than the Nissan Juke (20.0%) across comparable years. The biggest divergence was suspension, where the Juke recorded failures more often.
12.6%
Range Rover Evoque fail rate
20.0%
Juke fail rate
7.36pp
Difference
Side by side
| Metric | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Nissan Juke |
|---|---|---|
| MOT tests analysed | 751,920 | 1,684,080 |
| Pass rate | 87.4% | 80.0% |
| Fail rate | 12.6% | 20.0% |
Where they differ
| Category | Range Rover Evoque | Juke |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 2.6% | 9.5% |
| Visibility | 1.6% | 5.7% |
| Brakes | 3.8% | 5.5% |
| Lighting & signalling | 4.1% | 5.3% |
| Tyres | 4.4% | 4.8% |
Methodology & source. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-01. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.