2002 MG TF — MOT failures & pass rate

11,821 MOT tests on the 2002 MG TF are in this dataset, and 76.9% of them passed. That is effectively the same as coupes & convertibles of a similar age (22.6% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

77%
Pass rate
11,821
MOT tests analysed
23.1%
Fail rate
in line with
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
20.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (9.9%) and lighting & signalling (8.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, rbt (sp) and service brake performance — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 756 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 10.7% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 31.5% once past 120-150k — 3.0× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 30.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 TF 23.1% coupes & convertibles avg 22.6% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 MG TF
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 9.9% 1,175
2 Lighting & signalling 8.7% 1,030
3 Suspension 8.7% 1,026
4 Emissions & environmental 6.0% 710
5 Visibility 5.1% 597
6 Tyres 3.0% 356
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 9.9% Lighting & signalling 8.7% Suspension 8.7% Emissions & environmental 6.0% Visibility 5.1% Tyres 3.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 MG TF
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions756
2Rbt (sp)661
3Service brake performance459
4Wipers396
5Washers332
6Suspension arm317

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 MG TF
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 30.2% 3,575
2 Suspension 29.1% 3,444
3 Tyres 15.6% 1,842
4 Emissions & environmental 9.4% 1,117
5 Other defects 8.6% 1,014
6 Body, structure & corrosion 7.4% 877

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 10.7% 30-60k 19.3% 60-90k 26.5% 90-120k 29.5% 120-150k 31.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 TF
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 939 10.7%
30-60k 4,267 19.3%
60-90k 4,968 26.5%
90-120k 1,395 29.5%
120-150k 219 31.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 23.9% 20 yrs 22.9% 21 yrs 22.0% 22 yrs 24.2% 23 yrs 22.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 TF
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 2,821 23.9%
2022 2,581 22.9%
2023 2,309 22.0%
2024 2,157 24.2%
2025 1,953 22.4%

What to check before buying a 2002 TF

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 9.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 MG TFs pass their MOT?

76.9% of the 11,821 2002 MG TF MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 MG TF?

Brakes, recorded in 9.9% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (8.7%).

Does the 2002 TF get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.7% in the 0-30k band to 31.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 11,821 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data