2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 296 MOT tests, the 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl recorded an 80.4% pass rate. That is effectively the same as coupes & convertibles of a similar age (20.2% fail rate), so the MOT record here is unremarkable in either direction. Failures cluster in brakes, suspension and tyres.

80%
Pass rate
296
MOT tests analysed
19.6%
Fail rate
in line with
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
13.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (8.8%) and suspension (8.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, rbt (sp) and parking brake performance — ball joint alone was recorded 21 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2009 Cl fails 15.4% of the time in the 30-60k band and 17.1% at 120-150k, a spread of only 1.8 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 24.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 25.0% in 2021 to 20.4% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Cl 19.6% coupes & convertibles avg 20.2% National avg 25.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 8.8% 26
2 Suspension 8.5% 25
3 Tyres 5.7% 17
4 Lighting & signalling 4.7% 14
5 Visibility 2.0% 6
6 Emissions & environmental 1.7% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 8.8% Suspension 8.5% Tyres 5.7% Lighting & signalling 4.7% Visibility 2.0% Emissions & environmental 1.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint21
2Rbt (sp)12
3Parking brake performance8
4Brake discs7
5Rigid brake pipes5
6Position lamp5

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.3% 72
2 Suspension 19.9% 59
3 Tyres 14.2% 42
4 Emissions & environmental 5.7% 17
5 Road wheels 4.4% 13
6 Visibility 4.4% 13

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 15.4% 60-90k 21.7% 90-120k 22.6% 120-150k 17.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Cl
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 52 15.4%
60-90k 138 21.7%
90-120k 53 22.6%
120-150k 35 17.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 25.0% 13 yrs 10.2% 14 yrs 18.3% 15 yrs 23.3% 16 yrs 20.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Cl
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 68 25.0%
2022 59 10.2%
2023 60 18.3%
2024 60 23.3%
2025 49 20.4%

What to check before buying a 2009 Cl

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 8.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cls pass their MOT?

80.4% of the 296 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Mercedes-Benz Cl?

Brakes, recorded in 8.8% of tests, followed by suspension (8.5%).

Does the 2009 Cl get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.4% in the 30-60k band to 17.1% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 296 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data