2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl passed 84.3% of its 573 recorded MOT tests. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 21.1% of the time, so this is 5.4pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in brakes, tyres and suspension.

84%
Pass rate
573
MOT tests analysed
15.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
14.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Brakes dominates the failure mix at 8.6% of all tests — 4.4 points clear of tyres, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), rigid brake pipes and service brake performance — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 23 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 16.1% versus 9.6%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 25.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 16.7% in 2021 to 10.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Cl 15.7% coupes & convertibles avg 21.1% National avg 26.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 8.6% 49
2 Tyres 4.2% 24
3 Suspension 3.7% 21
4 Lighting & signalling 2.8% 16
5 Emissions & environmental 1.2% 7
6 Other defects 1.1% 6
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 8.6% Tyres 4.2% Suspension 3.7% Lighting & signalling 2.8% Emissions & environmental 1.2% Other defects 1.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)23
2Rigid brake pipes17
3Service brake performance13
4Registration plates10
5Ball joint10
6Parking brake performance8

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 25.5% 146
2 Suspension 20.2% 116
3 Tyres 18.1% 104
4 Emissions & environmental 7.8% 45
5 Other defects 4.5% 26
6 Road wheels 2.6% 15

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 9.6% 60-90k 16.4% 90-120k 18.8% 120-150k 16.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Cl
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 104 9.6%
60-90k 232 16.4%
90-120k 176 18.8%
120-150k 31 16.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 16.7% 14 yrs 13.8% 15 yrs 18.7% 16 yrs 17.5% 17 yrs 10.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Cl
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 108 16.7%
2022 123 13.8%
2023 134 18.7%
2024 114 17.5%
2025 94 10.6%

What to check before buying a 2008 Cl

On a 2008 Cl, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 8.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cls pass their MOT?

84.3% of the 573 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Mercedes-Benz Cl?

Brakes, recorded in 8.6% of tests, followed by tyres (4.2%).

Does the 2008 Cl get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.6% in the 30-60k band to 16.1% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 573 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data