2020 Mazda Bongo — MOT failures & pass rate

603 MOT tests on the 2020 Mazda Bongo are in this dataset, and 79.3% of them passed. Against MPVs of a similar age (11.3% fail rate), the 2020 Bongo comes out 9.5pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and emissions & environmental.

79%
Pass rate
603
MOT tests analysed
20.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
2.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.9% of tests against 6.3% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rear fog lamp, headlamp aim and headlamp — rear fog lamp alone was recorded 51 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 11.8% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 26.7% once past 120-150k — 2.3× the risk.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 19.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 15.4% of tests failed in 2021 against 20.6% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2020 Bongo 20.7% MPVs avg 11.3% National avg 7.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2020 Mazda Bongo
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.9% 96
2 Suspension 6.3% 38
3 Emissions & environmental 5.0% 30
4 Visibility 4.3% 26
5 Brakes 4.2% 25
6 Body, structure & corrosion 2.2% 13
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.9% Suspension 6.3% Emissions & environmental 5.0% Visibility 4.3% Brakes 4.2% Body, structure & corrosion 2.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2020 Mazda Bongo
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rear fog lamp51
2Headlamp aim35
3Headlamp26
4Wipers25
5Catalyst emissions25
6Ball joint dust cover22

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2020 Mazda Bongo
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 19.2% 116
2 Brakes 18.4% 111
3 Suspension 16.1% 97
4 Lighting & signalling 14.3% 86
5 Emissions & environmental 10.6% 64
6 Other defects 8.1% 49

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 11.8% 60-90k 19.4% 90-120k 27.7% 120-150k 26.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2020 Bongo
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 93 11.8%
60-90k 268 19.4%
90-120k 141 27.7%
120-150k 75 26.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 1 yr 15.4% 2 yrs 19.7% 3 yrs 23.2% 4 yrs 25.5% 5 yrs 20.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2020 Bongo
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 130 15.4%
2022 132 19.7%
2023 138 23.2%
2024 106 25.5%
2025 97 20.6%

What to check before buying a 2020 Bongo

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2020 Mazda Bongos pass their MOT?

79.3% of the 603 2020 Mazda Bongo MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 20.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2020 Mazda Bongo?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.9% of tests, followed by suspension (6.3%).

Does the 2020 Bongo get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.8% in the 30-60k band to 26.7% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 603 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data